Skip to main content

JFK and the F Bomb

The many audio recordings made by a brief span of U.S. presidents in the middle of last century are damn fascinating. Yet these recordings will likely stand as a brief anomaly of unparalleled insight, never again to be repeated in our history.

After Nixon, no president recorded anything (of which we know, anyway) in the way of their private meetings and phone conversations.

What we have from Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon are about as close as any of us will ever come to knowing first-hand how presidents interacted with others and how they operated in the inner recesses of the White House, out of the spotlight.

President Kennedy's are perhaps the most compelling listening, given how few recordings there are in total, how short his administration was, and of course his tragic murder at the peak of his political and personal prowess.

Here is a real gem in which Kennedy unleashes on AF General Godfrey McHugh over something rather trivial, which is what makes Kennedy's rather hyperbolic outrage so amusing. It shows how conscious Kennedy was of image and the mores of the time, but also a bit of how he probably didn't suffer bureaucratic fools gladly.

McHugh seems thunderstruck by Kennedy's profanity-laced tongue-lashing. All this over a photo of an Air Force officer posing next to Mrs. Kennedy's bed on Air Force One, one specially-bought for her during her pregnancy while in the White House.

Kennedy conflates the whole affair into a threat to Air Force funding, thundering "You just sank the Air Force budget!"

Great stuff...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...