Skip to main content

Obama and Gitmo: Being damned for being responsible

OK, first off: Gitmo is a blight on America's honor and needs to be closed.

That having been said, President-elect Barack Obama is getting way too much shit from people about his statement that closing down Gitmo is complicated and won't be accomplished in 100 days.

What exactly did you expect him to do?

If he were to issue an Executive Order closing Gitmo in his first week, he'd have three choices of what to do with the prisoners:

1) Transport them to Federal holding facilities within the US. There is precedent for keeping people months and even years without charges--President Jimmy Carter did it with the Marielista boatlift prisoners, and Reagan, Bush, Clinton all quietly followed suit, leaving them to rot--primarily at Fort Chaffee Arkansas. But given that most of the folks at Gitmo have known identities and already have attorneys, that's not going to work.

2) Find other countries to take them as prisoners. Aside from the moral implications (rendition to countries with torture and no-due-process death penalties), there's the problem. Dubya has not been negotiating this, so Obama's State Department would have to start from scratch.

3) Release them. Aside from the dangers inherent with about 10-15% of these folks, where do you plan on releasing them? A lot were taken on battlefields in Iraq or Afghanistan, so releasing them there would require the agreement of those governments. Afghanistan actually has taken a large number of Gitmo prisoners back, but only on a case by case basis.

Point being: having said I will close Gitmo, the new President should enjoy a reasonable amount of time to make good his promise in a responsible manner. It is an inherently different proposition, I would suggest, than developing a strategy for dealing with Iran or Gaza, both of which are much higher priority national security concerns and won't go away.

Here's what Obama could do right now to silence his critics: issue an early Executive Order ending all enhanced interrogation techniques at Gitmo, extend Geneva Convention protections to the detainees there (there is a way to do this for captives who do not have a protecting power, and immediately open up the facility to international inspection.

And--to be perfectly honest--I expect his administration to take those steps pretty early. This is a campaign promise that I believe Barack Obama will keep.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Exile them to Gilligan's Island and let the Skipper handle them.
Anonymous said…
I've been to Fort Chaffee, and I'd have to say sending them there would constitute cruel and unusual punishment.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...