Skip to main content

A Hopeful Sign?

I would love nothing more than to have any of my exceptions with President Obama and his policies be proven wrong.

I said the same of George W. Bush, but with absolutely zero expectations from get-go.

With Obama I sincerely still hold out for hope.

If he gets foreign policy right...and I mean real change...I think I could easily forgive many domestic policy excesses, at least during his tenure.

Jimmy Carter failed because backfiring middle-east interventionist policies, that he was too much of a lightweight to reverse, blew up in his face. At the same time the U.S. economy hit the rocks and hard. He was finished by these dual failures.

The biggest imperialist fantasy is being able to have both guns and butter. If Obama is serious about domestic prosperity, he will end our trillions in spending on empire building and policing the world.

Given his choices of DC-insidery neocon interventionists Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton as his top foreign policy voices, at least nominally, the outlook is not good for Obama.

The type of serious policy foreign policy changes required here are not about fixing our status or standing, but about ending how we try to project power through armed force and direct interventions, including our worldwide presence through military bases in compliant countries, whether friendly or not so.

This would be the only real change in our foreign policy.

It will require immediate action bold, swift and sustained to have any hope of seeing just the beginnings of such a change, one aimed at real peace rather than militarist-minded "peacemaking" or "peacekeeping".

In short, Obama has a very small window of opportunity.

Rather than be somewhat-obsessed with Abe Lincoln (great as he was) perhaps Obama should take time to listen to some of Robert Kennedy's speeches from 1968, as well as Martin Luther King's speeches on war, particularly in VietNam.

Today I read that there may be hope after all. I am hoping for it :

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici