Skip to main content

From the "I told you so" file: no Iraq peace dividend

MSNBC finally admits what I've been telling you for months--doubling down in Afghanistan will eliminate any savings netted from our pseudo-withdrawal from Iraq:

Even as U.S. troops return from Iraq, many eventually will find themselves headed to Afghanistan. And the peace dividend that accrues with the end of the Iraq war probably will be eaten up by the intensified U.S. effort in a nation known as the graveyard of empires.

The cost of the Afghanistan war will fall to American taxpayers who already have seen billions laid out to save the crippled U.S. financial sector even as they cope with the severest economic recession in more than half a century. Obama will need all his political finesse to put Americans at ease with spending billions more for a war in a distant land.


Better late than never.

Comments

Brian Shields said…
At this point, it seems like victory in Afghanistan is something that we must accomplish, because failing makes us just as equal to the other empires that tried and failed.

It seems like proving them wrong will prove them right, in the end. I mean, it's not like all signs point to that eventual outcome anyway.
Tyler Nixon said…
Saddest thing about this is the continued burden this puts on the troops and military families, many of whom have endured so much already and need a break.

At least Iraq has become somewhat less bloody for the soldiers. Now undoubtedly Afghanistan escalation will see increased troop injuries and deaths.
Brian Shields said…
Afghanistan has become more dangerous as of late. I was listening to the Howard Stern Show, which two of their cast members who went to Afghanistan on a USO tour with a bunch of comedians and said they could not go back to the same areas again because it was unsafe. Their next trip would have to be in a different are, if not a different country.

How often do you get to hear about world affairs on that show?
Anonymous said…
Americans are leaving Iraq a 5th world country. Sunnis (and the brains have left). Tent
cities and poverty, no health care reigns all over the country.

It is now a Shia Nation...signs in public places have women wearing burkas. Some cities have no schools, the hospitals are not all in operation, there is vast unemployment..oh and women are selling children...ending up in the worldwide child slave market.
Great job brownies!

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...