Skip to main content

Updated: He's back

UPDATE: jason steps back, everyone at DL is his/her own boss, and nobody is planning to explain what happened yesterday. But we still need more transparency in government and political organizations [oops, that was me, not him, on that last one].


donviti returns to Delawareliberal.

Despite public and private promises for full disclosure about the strange events of yesterday, however, the DL gang continues to pretend that there's nothing to see here.

But where is jason?

And if the blog actually has a direction, we're all hoping that they'll clue us in.
Labels:

Comments

Macho Camacho said…
Oh, it has a direction alright....swirling round and round and taking the poo with it!
August 21, 2009 at 10:18 AM
Delaware Dem said…
I am sure you can respect the fact that we are not a government organization, that no one is funding our efforts, and that our private communications should remain private. Thus your transparency charge is a ridiculous.

I am sorry that you are more interested in a soap opera, but we are not. We are moving on, and you should as well.
August 21, 2009 at 11:07 AM
Anonymous said…
Not a soap opera, more like Jerry Springer.
August 21, 2009 at 11:14 AM
Macho Camacho said…
Don't worry, I will be moving on...to the next phase.
August 21, 2009 at 11:26 AM
Anonymous said…
Delaware Dem, shouldn't you be threatening someone or calling them a cunt or something?
August 23, 2009 at 9:44 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...
70 comments
Read more

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...
31 comments
Read more