Skip to main content

Ezra Klein misses the point, but then--hey--isn't that what he's there for?

He writes thus about health insurance reform protesters:

What we're seeing here is not merely distrust in the House health-care reform bill. It's distrust in the political system. A healthy relationship does not require an explicit detailing of the "institutional checks" that will prevent one partner from beating or killing the other. In a healthy relationship, such madness is simply unthinkable. If it was not unthinkable, then no number of institutional checks could repair that relationship. Similarly, the relationship between the protesters and the government is not healthy. The protesters believe the government capable of madness. There is no evidence for that claim, which means that there is no answer for it, either. That claim is not about what is in this bill, or what government has done in Medicare and Medicaid and the VA. It is about what a certain slice of Americans think their government -- and by extension, their fellow citizens -- capable of.


It is perhaps worth reminding Mr Klein (or at least those of his readers to whom some semblance of history is important) of:

The US government's culpability in the Tuskegee Syphillis Experiment.

The US Army's LSD experiments and the US military's intentional exposure of troops to radiation during atomic testing.

The US government's role in the involuntary sterilization of thousands of Native American women in the 1970s.

The US government's conscious decision in the late 1800s to kill off all the buffalo herds in North America to force Native Americans onto reservations because they would starve if they did not go.

The US government's role in overthrowing the legally elected government of Guatemala and the assassination of Chilean President Salvadore Allende.

The US government's continuing war on drugs which now has our country having a larger percentage of the population incarcerated than communist China.

The US government's clandestine programs to help former SS officers and other war criminals from Nazi Germany to enter this country illegally, assume new identities, and avoid prosecution for war crimes.

The US government's illegal expansion of the Vietnam War into Cambodia and Laos.

The US government's direct military support of regimes that tortured and killed their peaceful political opposition in places like pre-revolutionary Iran, Honduras, and South Vietnam.

The US government has repeatedly, throughout American history beginning in 1798, attempted to curb freedom of the press and even freedom of speech at pretty much the drop of a hat.

I could go on, but you get the point and--unfortunately--Mr Klein never will.

For all the Truthers, Birthers, and Deathers out there I generally have intellectual contempt. Why? Because they believe the government capable of almost flawlessly executed multi-layered conspiracies that are carefully hidden for decades if not longer.

The truth is this: government malfeasance is normally exceptionally venal, poorly conceived, and badly hidden.

Klein's idiotic statement-- In a healthy relationship, such madness is simply unthinkable. If it was not unthinkable, then no number of institutional checks could repair that relationship--bespeaks a complete failure to understand the curbs on and protections against government power built into the US Constitution.

In Mr Klein's sparsely inhabited intellectual world, there is no need for a First Amendment, because to believe that the government would attempt to suppress dissident political speech is unhealthy.

In Mr Klein's PeeWee Hermann fantasy world, there is no need for a Fourth Amendment, because to believe that police officers would ever conduct illegal searches is to be in a state of mind that requires medication.

In Mr Klein's rather limited view of the US government, the Patriot Act, warrantless wiretapping, and the torture of prisoners are apparently my own paranoid delusions, because only the mentally unhealthy would ever believe that agents of the government could do such things.

Such is the quality and intellectual power of the one of the best-known Statist apologists.

Comments

Hube said…
One correction: Salvador Allende was the Chilean president, not Argentinian.
Bowly said…
You forgot slavery and Jim Crow, among others.

I've never understood how Klein rose to the level he's at. He's always struck me as worse than a fool. There's even been a term coined (not by me): "Klein boggle". I hope it catches on.
townie 76 said…
Steve,

You forgot one point on why government can never run a conspiracy, no one in the government can keep their mouth shut!

Hank

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...