Skip to main content

Disarming Delaware: one step at a time

Although only one major piece of gun control legislation (SB 35; universal background checks) actually passed the General Assembly this year, and--of course--advocates of "common sense gun laws" said they were not attempting to take guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens, the truth is somewhat different.

The truth is that we are in the midst of a conscious effort to chill the atmosphere for legitimate gun owners in Delaware until we reach the point where there will be no legitimate gun ownership in the state.

Consider the following three exhibits from this week's news:

Exhibit 1:  Wal-Mart stops selling firearms in Delaware.  Why?  Because SB 35 would have required the Sporting Goods departments of Wal-Mart to conduct third-party background checks even for people not purchasing a gun from the store, and the ambiguity of the law led Wal-Mart's liability attorneys to conclude that people wanting to trade or sell guns privately might well reach the conclusion that they had to bring the gun in question in with them.  Wal-Mart therefore decided, thanks to the liability issues inherent in SB 35, to get out of the firearms business.

So, congratulations, "common sense gun law" advocate:  today there are about seven fewer retailers in the State from which people can buy guns.  I have spoken to several people who own gun shops--they were pretty sure this would happen.  In the short run they are happy about it because it narrows the competitive field in their favor.  In the long run, however, they are worried that future limitations will threaten their own businesses.

Exhibit 2:  The case of Jeremy Preston, who was stopped for speeding and nailed with a felony arrest warrant because his TN Concealed Carry License expired (unknown to him) when he received his Delaware driver's license.  This is a wonderful case in which a technical violation (had Mr. Preston been carrying his loaded Glock on the seat beside him, instead of inside the glove compartment, he would never have been asked about his CCL) led (the next day) to a felony arrest warrant with the potential to ruin his entire career:
“It’s devastating for me,” Preston said in the article published Monday. “This is my career. I’ve spent a long time establishing a reputation as a hardworking engineer and now I get falsely arrested with these bogus charges, and it’s pretty serious.” 
“Some of the damage has been done,” Preston said, adding that his employers “are looking at me funny. They don’t have time for this. They don’t want the hassle. I can’t work at a nuclear plant with a felony.”
As Preston's attorney notes, the Attorney General's office doesn't really care about that:
It’s ‘roll first and deal with it later,’ ” Hurley said of the law enforcement approach in Delaware. “If somebody loses their job, that’s too bad. That’s the way the system works.”
There is a strong temptation to see this as Delaware authorities floating some sort of zero tolerance response to any gun violation, no matter how trivial.  You can hear that in Jeremy Preston's last statement:
Denney said prosecutors will propose that Preston not try to get the .40-caliber Glock pistol taken from him back from police until he gets a Delaware concealed-carry permit. Preston countered that he won’t get such a permit because he won’t ever “drive in Delaware again with a gun in my car.” 
Exhibit 3:  Crime down in Wilmington, but shootings up--which means that the "spin" in future is going to be, "We've done what we could with the existing laws, we need stronger gun control to put a dent in gun violence."  Let's be honest:  Delaware doesn't have a gun violence problem, Delaware has a Wilmington gun violence problem.

There are two takeaways for Libertarians here:

1.  The legislative initiatives of 2013 are not the end, but the beginning.  Under the slogan of stopping the "mentally ill gun nuts" who managed to prevent HB 88 from becoming law, we can expect to see an even larger slew of restrictive legislative initiative in the 148th Session of the General Assembly.  This is part of the old "throw enough shit at the barn and some of it will stick" strategy.

Because after a few rounds of shit-throwing, even if your aim is off most of the time, the entire barn will eventually be brown.

2.  "Gun grabber" rhetoric will serve us less well in the future.  The advocates of universal registration have managed to frame even radical proposals (like the portion of HB 35 that doesn't require any law enforcement member to have a warrant to examine background check applications, or doesn't require retired law enforcement agents to pass a background check at all) as "common sense" gun control measures that do not affect "sane gun owners."

These are powerful frames and memes, and they resonate with low-information voters.  Beau Biden in a suit pleading for the lives of school children is going to trump a sign that labels him a neo-Nazi in the long run.

It is an unfortunate truth, as Democratic strategist George Lakoff has expounded quite eloquently, that successful memes and frames must be refuted by other memes and frames; facts alone will not do that job.  In the upcoming months we will be discussing how that has to be done in 2014 in the increasinlyg anti-gun-rights climate being generated in Delaware.


delacrat said…
Exhibit 1: I don't follow this at all. Why would Wal-Mart be required to "conduct third-party background checks even for people not purchasing a gun from the store". If I purchase a shirt instead of a gun at Wal-Mart, they have to conduct a 3rd-party background check ?

Exhibit 2: It's Mr. Preston's fault that he is unaware that his CCL expired, not the state of Delaware's.

Besides, what does an engineer need a Glock for.

Exhibit 3: "Delaware doesn't have a gun violence problem, Delaware has a Wilmington gun violence problem.

Depends on how you look at it. As long as Wilmington is part of Delaware, Delaware does have a gun violence problem. I don't live in Wilmington myself, but like many Delawareans, I go there frequently; risking becoming a gun violence statistic. Hence Wilmington gun violence is a Delaware gun violence problem.

1--the law requires any holder of an FFL (Federal Firearms License) to perform background checks whether they are actually selling a gun or not. So two people selling a gun privately, under the law, could go to Wal-Mart and Wal-Mart is REQUIRED to conduct their background check for them even though they are not buying anything. The law is also ambiguously enough written that people may read it and believe they have to bring the weapon along when they are doing this. That's not a big deal for a gun shop, but it is a HUGE liability issue for Wal-Mart.

2--The old "ignorance of the law" meme doesn't work here. Mr. Preston had the opinions of three DE police officers and went to the TN information page. The TN info page on CC says zero about it being linked to your driver's license. Even armed with the knowledge that such is somewhere in the State Code it took me nearly an hour with Boolean searches to find it. Had I not know it was there, I would never have been able to find it. Ignorance of the law is only an effective argument if a reasonable person should have been able to figure out how to find the law.

3. You miss my point: gun violence in DE is almost totally confined to Wilmington. Most of the legislation passed or proposed in the last GA session would have saddled gun owners well outside Wilmington with new regulations that were unnecessary (because there is no gun violence problem in DE outside of Wilmington) without affecting the problem inside Wilmington.

If you are afraid to go to Wilmington (I'm not, and I don't really understand that fear), then I'd suggest a concealed carry permit.

But don't get it from Tennessee.
delacrat said…
1 - Thank's for clarifying. But not being a fan of Wal-Mart irregardless of the gun issue, I nevertheless see this as a positive.

2 - That TN does not link CC to a drivers license or provide a separate document for it's CC citizens is not a problem of Delaware law, but of TN law.

3 - Your suggestion that visitors to Wilmington "carry" was implemented by a Mr. Matusiewicz at the County Courthouse, resulting in the deaths of two women, (despite the presence of the armed guards.)

Guns don't make you safe, they make you dangerous.

Anonymous said…
The ones delacrat does not like get screwed. Nice plan for governance, that.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and