Skip to main content

Delaware politics as usual: another laugher from Senate Dems on the Treasurer

How funny is this?

Democratic lawmakers will waste little time next week in going after Delaware Treasurer Chip Flowers. 
The Senate Executive Committee, led by Senate President Pro Tem Patricia Blevins, D-Elsmere, will consider a bill to give an unelected board, not the popularly elected Flowers, the sole authority to make decisions on how to invest a $2 billion taxpayer portfolio. 
Members of Gov. Jack Markell’s administration authored the bill last year, but lawmakers punted it on the final day of the legislative session in June after a behind-closed-doors meeting with Flowers and members of Markell’s cabinet.
Let me count the ways:

1.  Senate President Pro Tem Patti Blevins (D-Highmark) is going to go after someone for bad fiscal management practices, and make them accountable.  This would be the same Senator Blevins who helped gin up the deal that in allowing Highmark to buy out Blue Cross Blue Shield of Delaware and establish a private insurance monopoly in the state, while also exempting Highmark from a $175 million reserve requirement and taking away most of the Attorney General's oversight powers.

2.  The rest of our Senate Democratic leadership--you know, the folks who impotently watched the train wreck that was Fisker, spent millions bailing out racinos, and routinely wastes tens of millions on corporate welfare every session--is now to be considered the paragon of financial oversight!?

3.  . . . or should that be the lapdogs of the Governor's office?  The article admits that Jack Markell's people, not our financial genius Senators, wrote the bill.  I would be willing to bet you that that before the last week of the session no more than three Senators could have even explained to you what the Cash Management Policy Board was, or what it did.

4.  And this piece of serious watch-dog financial legislation was "punted ... on the final day of the legislative session in June after a behind-closed-doors meeting ...."  You know what?  Most of these Democrats will be out there this year running on government transparency, standing in front of a record of closed-door-meetings, illegal task forces, and secret AG opinions, and the thing of it is that they don't even have the class to be embarrassed by their own hypocrisy.

5.  Chip Flowers is an easy target:  from his Alaska trip to his penchant for sticking his foot in his mouth every time he gives an interview.  Most Democrats don't really like him (do I hear the word "uppity" instead of "assertive" or "hard-charging"?), which is why he barely beat Colin Bonini the first time around.  But the reality is that Chip Flowers is a distraction.  Chip doesn't have a damn thing to do with Delaware's $150 million budget shortfall, with the losses on Fisker, with the ridiculous decision to bet future budgets on casino gambling.  He's part of a package put together to keep you from noticing that the State of Delaware is not just on the financial edge, but also that neither the Democrats nor the Republicans has the slightest idea what to do about it.

Last year the distractors were marriage equality, transgender equality (both good things but nothing to do with economics), gun control, and the illegal charter school task force.  This year, if the early whispers are any guide, the distractors will be Chip Flowers, gun control, and the minimum wage.  What these distractors are intended to do is allow our legislators to seem to have momentum, and to throw themselves celebratory parties, while (as usual) secretly writing a budget that protects their corporate contributors at all costs.

The Chip Flowers Control Act--a new substitute for a legislative agenda.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I'm just happy someone else is out looking for distractors too.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...