Skip to main content

So we don't forget Jasalyn Davis-Denkins scored her 1,000th point for William Penn yesterday

OK I don't do much sports reporting.  OK I don't do any sports reporting.

But ...

Today's WNJ Sports page celebrated Meghan Doohan of Archmere for scoring her 1,000th career point in a game against Concord.  She got the big headline, the photo with the big smile, and the full-length article write-up.

She deserved it.

But so did Jasalyn Davis-Denkins of William Penn High School, who also scored her 1,000th career point in a game against Charter School of Wilmington the same night.  No headline, no photo, and no article.

I wouldn't have known about Davis-Denkins except that my daughter plays for CSW and so I was at the game.  It was an exciting contest that went down to the wire, and I'm sure it put a pallor on her record to lose the game at the buzzer.  But I don't care about that--she deserved the same treatment that Meghan Doohan got.

Some adult--whether at William Penn or at the News Journal--seriously dropped the ball here (pun intended), so in my own way I'll try to even the score (ouch!) with three observations about Ms. Davis-Denkins:

1.  She is an incredibly talented athlete with a college and possibly pro career ahead of her.  I watched her almost casually sink a three-pointer when (a) off-balance; (b) unable to see the basket; and (c) having two of our girls hanging (read uncalled fouls) all over her.

2.  She never stopped competing and coaching her teammates on the floor, even when--in the last 5.6 seconds--it would have taken a miracle to get the ball up the floor and score three points.

3.  She has the class of a true athlete.  With about one minute left, William Penn had to foul to have a chance.  Davis-Denkins leapt out and fouled a much smaller CSW guard.  She pushed her just enough to make contact in front of the official, and then reached out and grabbed her shoulders to make sure she didn't fall.  In so many situations like this I have seen athletes give in to anger or frustration and risk hurting their opponents.  Ms. Davis-Denkins clearly has some perspective on what is worth it and what is not.

I hope that William Penn High School made a big deal of it today for her.

Next year, apparently, she'll be playing for Northeastern University.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...