Skip to main content

Race to the Top: Let's see if I've got this straight

According to the WNJ Editorial Board this morning:

Delaware didn't manage to spend the $119 million in four years as required by the grant.

What would you do with $119 million? 
What would you do if you only had a short time to spend it? 
And what would you do if the deadline came and you had not spent it all? 
Most of us would ask – politely, we’re sure – for extra time. 
Delaware is doing just that. As the spending deadline approaches, Delaware is expected to ask the federal government for a little extra time to allocate the state’s Race to the Topmoney. 

Delaware is not quite sure how much money remains to be spent.
That allocation is probably in the area of $10 million to $12 million, with a couple of million here or there still held by Delaware’s school districts.
Oh, and we have no real evidence that any of this has done any good.

Delaware competed in the Race to the Top contest and won first place, getting $119 million. 
What has come of it? 
The state used much of the money for standardized testing and evaluations of teachers. 
More was spent on training and bonuses for teachers and principals. 
Was it worth it? While many people have already formed their own ideas, it is probably too early to tell.

And--finally--there is no plan for what to do if the Feds say "No" or after the money all goes away following an extension year.

Quality of the reforms aside, the question that taxpayers should ask was raised recently by Ann Visalli, director of Delaware’s Office of Management and Budget. 
She pointedly asked state education officials what their plans are for the day the federal money disappears. 
What programs will stay? What programs will go? And who will pay for it? 
“We want to be able to know what the world will look like when this is over. I want to be able to see ‘here are the things that were funded by Race to the Top that we are not requesting from the state, and here’s what we are requesting,” Ms. Visalli said. “That’s the picture I need, and I anxiously wait to see that.”
So the situation (in fewer words than the WNJ uses) is this:  we didn't comply with the grant requirements, we're asking for an extension, we have no proof that the spending did any good, and we've got no plan for what to do when the money runs out.

Delaware Education policy under Governor Markell and our General Assembly in one sentence.

And if it has become so obvious that even the Markell Public Relations Bureau WNJ Editorial Board has to admit it . . . wow.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...