Skip to main content

Playing games with polls in Iowa

This is neither an Iowa prediction nor a Ron Paul commercial, but an observation that complements the one Dana made over on Delaware Watch about excluding Paul from debates.

Here's how Newsmax presents the latest Zogby tracking poll that ended yesterday:


With a Huckabee surge and a Romney dip, the former Arkansas governor opened up a six-point lead over his nearest rival. Former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson also lost a point, and Arizona Sen. John McCain, who has been surging in New Hampshire, faded here into a tie for fourth place.


Notice that the poll doesn't say who McCain is in a tie for fourth place with.

From Real Clear Politics here's the breakdown of the same Zogby tracking poll:

Huckabee=31%
Romney=25%
Thompson=11%
McCain=10%
Paul=10%

Funny, when you look at the numbers it would seem that the real news is that Ron Paul has risen into double digits and entered a virtual three-way tie for third place, given the usual margin for error.

Newmax is not always the most credible of sources, but it is generally well to the right of center.

Why is it also participating in the "Ron Paul blackout?"

Let's say, for the sake of argument, that Paul pulls off an upset and finishes third by a point ahead of Thompson and McCain. Is this how the news lead tomorrow will read?

As expected, Mick Huckabee held onto his lead to take 31% of the Iowa caucus vote, with Mitt Romney managing only a disappointing second place at 25%. John McCain and Fred Thompson tied for fourth place with 10% each, performing about as expected. Moving on to New Hampshire....


If you read this blog regularly, you will know I am NOT a Ron Paul fanatic, but you really do have to wonder what's going on here.

Comments

The Last Ephor said…
What's going on? Simply put: the piggies at the trough know that Ron Paul is serious about putting K Street out of business and ending spending on a fundamental, radical level. I don't know how much he'd actually be able to accomplish but you can bet nobody wants to find out. That they are going to such lengths to marginalize and silence the man speaks volumes. I'm not raging Ron Paul fan but it's pretty clear they're pulling out all the stops to keep him from going anywhere.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...