Skip to main content

Here's where you wonder if American corporations or the Federal government will ever grow a pair....

... and tell China what to do with its pending new orders for castrated PCs.

From WSJ:

BEIJING -- China plans to require that all personal computers sold in the country as of July 1 be shipped with software that blocks access to certain Web sites, a move that could give government censors unprecedented control over how Chinese users access the Internet.

The government, which has told global PC makers of the requirement but has yet to announce it to the public, says the effort is aimed at protecting young people from "harmful" content. The primary target is pornography, says the main developer of the software, a company that has ties to China's security ministry and military.


So here's the question: will the Federal government and/or American businesses decide to go right ahead and take the profits available from censorship or not?

As a libertarian, I know it's their free choice, and I expect the argument that somebody in France or Germany or Korea will sell neutered computers if we don't.

I also know that expecting any sense of protecting individual liberty in large organizations--government or corporate--is a lost cause: after all, we pretty much all have televisions with the V-chip, now don't we?

Or (and this would be a lot more fun, now that I think about it), we could sell them the damn computers and then saturate the internet with freeware that is capable of eliminating their software filtering system....

Comments

Miko said…
Eliminating filtering software usually is fairly easy, unless it's coupled with spyware (since then you need to also generate fake spy reports); even with spyware it's doable. I'd be surprised if a workaround isn't published withing 24 hours after the initial release.

China has been fighting and losing this battle (at least among the tech-savvy) for years. I too wish they'd stop trying, but in the mean time it'll serve only to highlight how ineffective their efforts necessarily must be.
tom said…
Steve, I'm curious what you think the U.S Federal Government has to do with any of this. They don't manufacture computers. And you couldn't really be implying that you want them to ban the manufacture or sale of filtering software, could you?
Nancy Willing said…
I just got an email about this. Sign a petition if you think it will help (link on my blog). It looks like there is enough pushback now to slow this thing down.

"There is already buzz that manufacturing executives will attempt to negotiate with the Chinese government to roll back this rule — this is a great first step. But it's not enough.
Click here to tell Dell CEO Michael Dell and HP CEO Mark Hurd to pursue these negotiations as vigorously as possible — and, if all else fails, to refuse to install the "Green Dam" software on their machines. "
tom said…
it would be nice if computer vendors felt strongly enough about freedom of information to risk 100% of sales in their largest (or soon to be largest) market, but i wouldn't really fault them if they don't.

in the end, it doesn't matter either way because connection filtering is performed by software, and software can be easily modified or replaced.

even if Microsoft, Apple, etc. cooperate fully with the Chinese gov't and implement filters, and optionally use hardware DRM to make it difficult to bypass or remove, it will eventually be bypassed or removed by hackers, who will distribute their mods widely.

and that is completely ignoring the impact of Free & Open Source operating systems like Linux and FreeBSD which are very widely used in China. While China may be able to intimidate some of the major Linux vendors (Dell, Redhat, Suse) w/ loss of sales, any restrictions they included could be trivially removed.

and there is no such possibility w/ FreeBSD or other BSD variants (although I'd love to see how Theo de Raadt would respond to such a request), or most of the lesser known Linux distributions because there are no vendors--they are created by volunteers and distributed free by tens of millions of servers around the world. even if they were all well advertised it would be a daunting task for any firewall to block them all.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...