Skip to main content

Here's where you wonder if American corporations or the Federal government will ever grow a pair....

... and tell China what to do with its pending new orders for castrated PCs.

From WSJ:

BEIJING -- China plans to require that all personal computers sold in the country as of July 1 be shipped with software that blocks access to certain Web sites, a move that could give government censors unprecedented control over how Chinese users access the Internet.

The government, which has told global PC makers of the requirement but has yet to announce it to the public, says the effort is aimed at protecting young people from "harmful" content. The primary target is pornography, says the main developer of the software, a company that has ties to China's security ministry and military.


So here's the question: will the Federal government and/or American businesses decide to go right ahead and take the profits available from censorship or not?

As a libertarian, I know it's their free choice, and I expect the argument that somebody in France or Germany or Korea will sell neutered computers if we don't.

I also know that expecting any sense of protecting individual liberty in large organizations--government or corporate--is a lost cause: after all, we pretty much all have televisions with the V-chip, now don't we?

Or (and this would be a lot more fun, now that I think about it), we could sell them the damn computers and then saturate the internet with freeware that is capable of eliminating their software filtering system....

Comments

Miko said…
Eliminating filtering software usually is fairly easy, unless it's coupled with spyware (since then you need to also generate fake spy reports); even with spyware it's doable. I'd be surprised if a workaround isn't published withing 24 hours after the initial release.

China has been fighting and losing this battle (at least among the tech-savvy) for years. I too wish they'd stop trying, but in the mean time it'll serve only to highlight how ineffective their efforts necessarily must be.
tom said…
Steve, I'm curious what you think the U.S Federal Government has to do with any of this. They don't manufacture computers. And you couldn't really be implying that you want them to ban the manufacture or sale of filtering software, could you?
Nancy Willing said…
I just got an email about this. Sign a petition if you think it will help (link on my blog). It looks like there is enough pushback now to slow this thing down.

"There is already buzz that manufacturing executives will attempt to negotiate with the Chinese government to roll back this rule — this is a great first step. But it's not enough.
Click here to tell Dell CEO Michael Dell and HP CEO Mark Hurd to pursue these negotiations as vigorously as possible — and, if all else fails, to refuse to install the "Green Dam" software on their machines. "
tom said…
it would be nice if computer vendors felt strongly enough about freedom of information to risk 100% of sales in their largest (or soon to be largest) market, but i wouldn't really fault them if they don't.

in the end, it doesn't matter either way because connection filtering is performed by software, and software can be easily modified or replaced.

even if Microsoft, Apple, etc. cooperate fully with the Chinese gov't and implement filters, and optionally use hardware DRM to make it difficult to bypass or remove, it will eventually be bypassed or removed by hackers, who will distribute their mods widely.

and that is completely ignoring the impact of Free & Open Source operating systems like Linux and FreeBSD which are very widely used in China. While China may be able to intimidate some of the major Linux vendors (Dell, Redhat, Suse) w/ loss of sales, any restrictions they included could be trivially removed.

and there is no such possibility w/ FreeBSD or other BSD variants (although I'd love to see how Theo de Raadt would respond to such a request), or most of the lesser known Linux distributions because there are no vendors--they are created by volunteers and distributed free by tens of millions of servers around the world. even if they were all well advertised it would be a daunting task for any firewall to block them all.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...