Skip to main content

Just let them wear burqas

British author Nick Ross argues that dressing "provocatively" is the equivalent to leaving your laptop on the seat of an unlocked car:
The main argument of my book is this: we can aggravate crime by tempting fate, and we curb it by playing safe. We have come to acknowledge it is foolish to leave laptops on the back seat of the car. We would laugh at a bank that stored sacks of cash by the front door. We would be aghast if an airport badly skimped on its security….  Our forebears might be astonished at how safe women are today given what throughout history would have been regarded as incitement … 
Then there's this:
He says things like, “Rape is one of the most defiling crimes and there is never excuse or justification for it.” Then he says, “In any other crime we take account of provocation and contributory factors. Even in murder. Why not with sex?” And he wonders why readers are a little confused. 
More "legitimate rape" goodness to start your day.

Comments

The Last Ephor said…
Remember that this defense only applies to members of the Religion Of Permanent Offense(TM). All others are expected to be civilized.
Anonymous said…
And if you drove around in a 20 year old POS you wouldnt be tempting people to car jack you; and if you did have a structure made of wood people wouldnt feel the need for arson; and if you didnt have such cute kids pedophiles wouldnt have such control issues;
tom said…
It probably depends on what the burqa looks like...

but then again, "provocative" fashion has been around for a long time. get over it assholes. or better yet, enjoy it.
NCSDad said…
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324787004578497420867545326.html
Delaware Watch said…
I once read that a high percentage of men have rape sexual fantasies. I wonder why the author doesn't attribute this tendency in some men as the cause of rape and not to how women dress. I suspect the male rapist brings the "stuff" that is both necessary and sufficient to cause rape to the act of rape and how a woman dresses has nothing to do with it.
pandora said…
As the mother of a 16 year old daughter comments like Ross' make me sick to my stomach.

Love the "women as property" theme running through his rape apologist arguments. Incitement? Really?

And I'm sick of the "Men can't control themselves around a 'provocatively' dressed women, so if women don't want to be raped..."

Not only is this blatant victim blaming, but it's horribly insulting to men - MOST of which have no problem controlling themselves.


Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici