Skip to main content

The continuing Markell shell game on public education and Delaware's budget

You have to wonder if today's article in the WNJ about the fact that the Markell administration despairs of finding more money to pay teachers is not intended as a subtle reminder to DSEA President and DOE employee Frederika Jenner not to stray too far off the education reform reservation.

After all, it was only yesterday that Jenner published an op-ed in the News Journal criticizing teacher performance appraisal systems, one of the lynch-pins of Governor Markell's education reform, and today we're told that ...
... budget projections released this week confirm what many expected – it’s unlikely the state can afford any major boosts to teacher pay.
In other words:  mess with me, Jenner, and your teacher raises sleep with the fishes.

(Not that Jenner and senior DSEA leadership ever mess with the Markell administration, even rhetorically, very often.  For the most part the state teacher's union not only takes education "reform" lying down by signing off on everything the Governor wants, but also continues to pump thousands--even hundreds of thousands--into the campaign treasuries of politicians who cash the checks and then blithely vote against the union's interests.)

The other irony here is that in its unending quest to consider teachers the only possible variable that can move education forward, the Markell administration repeatedly proposes spending "targeted" money on raising the pay of some teachers (rather than others) in the persistently vain hope that this will miraculously cure the achievement disparities among Delaware students:

Markell and his aides have said they’re working out a detailed plan, but they’ve talked about a few broad proposals. They include possible raises, especially for teachers in critical subject areas – like math and science – and at schools with high populations of at-risk students. 
Markell has also said he wants to create “alternate career paths” so rock-star teachers can move up the career ladder without leaving the classroom to become a principal or administrator.
So let me get this straight:  while creating a slush fund for charter schools (not to mention a transportation funding loophole for them as well), the Markell administration's answer to high-poverty schools is to pay the teachers there more?

The answer is not to invest in more programs for those students?

The answer is not to invest in more teachers so that class sizes drop?

The answer is not to provide students with laptops to take home?

Nope.

The answer is that if we pay teachers more to teach poor students, and saddle them with a draconian performance appraisal system, poor kids (along with kids who don't speak English real well and kids with special needs) will suddenly start to read, write, and cipher better on high-stakes standardized tests, and all will be well with Delaware.

(And, by the way, before you accept the Markell administration assertion that we are severely limited by budget constraints, remember to ask about how many millions we are pouring into bail-outs for casinos, corporate welfare, and the maintenance of the Delaware Information Analysis Center among other pieces of outright pork.  There's plenty of money in Delaware's budget if they'd actually allow adults to figure out how to allocate it.)

Comments

Anonymous said…
It's a stretch to pin this statement on Frederika Jenner's op-ed... Primarily because the op-ed did not discuss salary; it was about Mark Murphy inept handling of Common Core...

I am pretty sure that 99% of Delaware agrees that Mark Murphy was inept at rolling out Common Core...

Plus the turnaround is too soon, I believe. If a quid for quo response the date would be Tuesday a Jack rebuttal was printed.

Third, if it was quid for quo, it wouldn't be handled by Jack in a editorial battle. He would have picked up the phone, and basically said WTF are you doing?

And the budget will shrink, due to the projections. We know this.

The smart thing to do would be to close down Common Core and move those funds over to operations... 8 million spent to AIR would create 160 $50,000 a year teaching positions, or... 4000 people getting $2000 a year raises....

Just raising the state tax 1% on those reporting $1 million or more, would give $35 million extra.

And those top 1% earned 20% on their stocks this year, so if you taxes as high as 5%, they would still net 115% on their investment, which would still be a record year... going as far back as the 20's.... So they certainly can afford it...

The problem is this administration thinks human beings are not important.

That is about it.
Anonymous said…
Couple of errors slipped past... that should be a 15% gain and not a 115% gain.. Still don't know where the other "1" was hiding.

"taxes" on the fourth line from the bottom was supposed to be "taxed"...

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba