Skip to main content

The News Journal editorial page: insulating Governor Markell by making him into an adjective

At some point I recall seeing--either at kilroy's or delawareliberal--a comment that it was telling when the Veasey report about campaign finance was finally published in the WNJ front page there was no mention of it on the editorial page.

Today it made the editorial page (picture Jack Markell picking up the phone and saying, "Guys?  What gives?  I need some cover here.")

It is embarrassing.  It would have been better to keep silent.


The WNJ editorial board is pleased that the special prosecutor recommended no accountability, and is quite ready to excoriate all the right people:
Former liquor executive Christopher Tigani was the biggest offender. He has already pleaded guilty to a variety of campaign finance law violations, including reimbursing employees who made campaign contributions.
Then there's this:
One businessman, Michael Zimmerman, claimed representatives of Gov. Jack Markell’s campaign recommended he reimburse employees who made contributions. However, the report notes Mr. Zimmerman, who pleaded guilty to a felony charge for illegal contributions, could not recall who told him that. Investigators also could not find any proof of it either. 
And, of course, this:
Sen. David McBride, apparently took beer and vodka from the Tigani group. The only debate is whether he took these gifts on a regular or semi-regular basis. Either way is shameful.
What is truly interesting is that Governor Jack Markell never appears in the editorial as a noun, only an adjective, like here:
Michael Zimmerman claimed representatives of Gov. Jack Markell’s campaign recommended he reimburse employees who made contributions. 
And here:
The report notes that on one occasion the Markell campaign did not clarify the ownership and at other times the contributors did not understand the differences. When that was pointed out, the Markell campaign passed the money along to a charity. 
It's pretty simple, actually:  by never mentioning the governor as a person, the WNJ Editorial Board chooses to sanitize, minimize, or even erase any possible connection between Governor Jack Markell (the noun) and "Gov. Jack Markell's campaign" (the adjective), and especially between Governor Jack Markell (the noun) and other nouns like Christopher Tigani or Michael Zimmerman.

Instead, mentioning only one politician in the entire state by name--Senator Dave McBride--the WNJ Editorial Board lambasts his conduct as "shameful" (even though there is far less grounds to suspect gigantic influence peddling in his case than in the adjectival Governor's), and completely omits any reference to Senator Dave Sokola (another Markell ally).

So that's it:  the paper that fearlessly accused former Governor Ruth Ann Minner (after she had left office) of being corrupt, has taken on the role of the fearless Vichy French inspector in Casablanca:  "We are shocked, shocked we tell you, to discover that influence peddling has been occurring in Delaware.  Round up Senator McBride at once and have him shot!"

ring.  ring.

"What?  Yes, of course, Governor.  No, your name will be kept out of it entirely.  And should I send your winnings to the usual numbered Swiss account?"

---------
A postscript:  there have been occasions when I have lambasted (and sometimes unfairly, I think, in retrospect) some of the wNJ's hard-working news staff.  Reporters like Nichole Dobo, Wade Malcolm, Jonathan Starkey, and Matthew Allbright do the very best they can under circumstances that the public generally doesn't ever get to see or know about.

But I've also worked with the WNJ Editorial Board as a member of the Community Advisory Board.

They're smart people.  They know better than this.

Comments

Anonymous said…
TNJ editorial board would have praised Tammany Hall.

They have ZERO credibility, ZERO.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?