Skip to main content

Here's a thought for Libertarians trying to select a Presidential candidate. . . .

. . . and that's to stop listening to people who call each other assholes, or worse.

I have been perusing, and occasionally participating in, a variety of threads at Third Party Watch that I'm not even going to bother to link with.

That's because, instead of actually discussing the issues, or even the candidates, most of the posts devolve into scatological name-calling and multi-paragraph self-justifications of "my prior credentials as a better Libertarian than you are."

What's truly disturbing about this is that it is occurring in The Party of Principle, in which the fundamental principle is supposed to non-aggression or the non-initiation of force, fraud, or coercion.

Now I am a firm supporter of free speech, even though I am fighting the urge to initiate force and send a few of these jerks to the gulag.

But exactly how does a Libertarian, who supposedly believes in personal responsibility and non-aggression actually rationalize (a) the idea that calling other people offensive names equates with winning an argument, or that (b) any of this would make anyone ever want to listen to a Libertarian candidate anyway?

After all, isn't it a Libertarian premise that a state with a minimal government (or even an anarcho-capitalist society with no government at all) would be a preferable place to live? That people and communities would be self-regulating without the intrusion of government?

And calling other members of your party assholes (and, trust me, much worse) proves this point, exactly how?

So here's my thought for Libertarians trying to select a President: Make some logical--even passionate--arguments for your candidate and your cause, but realize that the first (or at least the fifth) time you descend into name-calling you've not only lost me, but most of the other adults in the room.

(I am pleased to report that supporters of Dr George Phillies--and the candidate himself--have not to my knowledge been engaging in such idiocy. In fact, several people posting, some of whom are not supporting Phillies on the issues, have made positive comments about his ability to remain civil.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?