Skip to main content

BIG SHOCKER : Democrats Sell Out American People to Bush Administration and Telecoms

The NY Times reports yet another reason why having Democrats in control of Congress is no better than big government Republicans running the show, you just get a lot more whine with your cheese.

These people are just gutless, spineless liars. At least the Bushie Republicans are straight-up fascists. The Democrats bitch and pretend otherwise, and then show their true colors with their actions.

Pelosi and Hoyer are disgraces. Both are what is wrong with Washington. Entrenched lifer insiders cutting deals to protect corporate and statist interests, civil liberties and the public interest be damned.

Ex post facto immunity for major telecoms' trampling the Constitution as useful tools for a rogue imperial now-lame duck president, on his way out the door.

Of course, they have let Bush and his henchman get away with murder, too craven to impeach the son-of-a-bitch...why not help their telecom lobbyist pals out of a jam, too?

The money line : "I think the White House got a better deal than even they had hoped to get,” said Senator Christopher S. Bond, Republican of Missouri, who led the negotiations."


I guess the D's want to make sure Barack is all set up for his franchise. Yeah, change we can believe in...like legalizing Ma Bell's secret spying.

Way to go, lying Democrat pigs. No better than Bush.


CONGRESS STRIKES DEAL TO OVERHAUL WIRETAP LAW

WASHINGTON — After months of wrangling, Democratic and Republican leaders in Congress struck a deal on Thursday to overhaul the rules on the government’s wiretapping powers and provide what amounts to legal immunity to the phone companies that took part in President Bush’s program of eavesdropping without warrants after the Sept. 11 attacks.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/20/washington/20fisa.html?_r=2&pagewanted=print


UPDATE - SHOCKER PT. DEUX : OBAMA BACKS UP BUSH ADMINISTRATION - PROMISES AS PRESIDENT HE'LL BE A MORE OBSERVANT WIRETAPPER - USES TYPICAL RHETORIC

"It is not all that I would want. But given the legitimate threats we face, providing effective intelligence collection tools with appropriate safeguards is too important to delay. So I support the compromise, but do so with a firm pledge that as President, I will carefully monitor the program, review the report by the Inspectors General, and work with the Congress to take any additional steps I deem necessary to protect the lives - and the liberty - of the American people."

Additional steps? What, like newer, better forms of big brother-come-to-life illegal spying on American citizens? Somehow I doubt he means less.

But of course, BigGuvBama will be better than the rest.




Comments

This totally ticked me off. I thought (naively, I guess) that the Democrats would finally show some backbone. I am disappointed yet again.

I'm sure it won't be the last time.
Anonymous said…
I wanted to be excited about change in 2006, but I should have known better.
It's so much fun right now watching dv and jason at De Lib spinning this in different directions....
It's so much fun right now watching dv and jason at De Lib spinning this in different directions....
Anonymous said…
Well, the truth is that it's difficult to spin as anything other an a total abdication of their campaign platforms in 2006 and in 2008.

In 2006, they said "elect us and we'll end the Iraq War." Then they passed a toothless resolution and funded the war this year to prolong it for at least another 2 years -- while also providing Bush with enough money to launch other military operations against neighbors like Syria and Iran.

In 2006 and 2008, they've said "elect us and we'll end the PATRIOT Act and warrantless wiretaps." But here they are giving Bush a wet-dream law, better than he'd ever hoped for.

These are two prime examples of how the Democrats and Republicans are identical, and a vote for one is a vote for the other -- regardless of their rhetoric.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?