Skip to main content

The Greensboro News-Record steps up for Michael Munger

On today's editorial page:

By the numbers, Michael Munger has a lot of nerve asking for a microphone at gubernatorial debates.

Numbers of registered voters in North Carolina, that is.

Democrats: 2.6 million.

Republicans: 1.9 million.

Libertarians: 4.


But Munger, the Libertarian Party's candidate for governor, deserves a place with Democrat Beverly Perdue and Republican Pat McCrory anyway.

The Libertarian Party's roll of voters, all four of them, is comically low because North Carolina didn't recognize it until a few weeks ago. The party qualified by submitting petitions signed by more than 100,000 citizens and now is entitled to place candidates on the ballot in November. Before then, people who held Libertarian ideas couldn't register as Libertarians. Some were among the 1.2 million North Carolinians registered as unaffiliated.

As the candidate of the third recognized party, Munger ought to be invited to all gubernatorial debates. The decision is up to sponsors, but surely a third person on stage won't detract from a full and lively discussion of issues. More likely, Munger would add some interesting ideas.

He's no slouch when it comes to ideas. He holds a doctorate in economics from Washington University in St. Louis and chairs the Political Science Department at Duke. He's also taught at Dartmouth College, the University of Texas and UNC-Chapel Hill and was an economist for the Federal Trade Commission in the 1980s.

But Munger also knows he could set back his party if he makes a poor impression on voters.

"If I'm invited to the debates, and I do a bad job, voters are going to say 'I'm not interested,' " he told the News & Record's Mark Binker.

The point is that voters should have a chance to listen and decide. Sponsoring organizations should make room for Munger on stage because the state is better served when more points of view are considered. If Libertarians make sense, their numbers will grow.


You have to wonder, however, whether newspaper editors in the Tarheel State have always been so fair-minded, or whether it's just possible that raising a ruckus on behalf of your candidates instead of engaging in constant back-biting ("you're not Libertarian enough for me") might actually help make a difference.

Meanwhile, Michael, maybe we'll get you into one of those debates yet....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...