Skip to main content

Who would you rather see drill for oil off the coast of Florida: Brazil, China, Venezuela or the US?


This from Fausta's Blog:

Brazilian state oil company Petrobras is studying a block in deep Cuban waters for possible exploration as part of broader cooperation with the Caribbean island, a top advisor to the company said on Friday.

"We are planning to cooperate not only in exploration and production, but lubricants, refining and training," Andre Ghirardi told Reuters in Havana at a one-day meeting of Brazilian and Cuban businessmen....

The US Geological Survey estimated the North Cuba basin could contain 4.6 billion barrels of oil, with a high-end potential of 9.3 billion barrels, and close to 1 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.


China and Venezuela have already initiated the first stages of drilling in the North Cuba basin.

Facts about foreign drilling immediately off our shores:

1) We have no control over the environmental impact of these operations as they take place in international waters.

2) All three nations pursue oil with State-owned companies, which generally pay their government 50% profits off the top before the product is offered on the world market (ala Sonangol in Angola). Therefore foreign oil off the Florida coast will not necessarily be cheaper than oil imported from Africa, the North Sea, or the Middle East.

So explain to me again why you'd rather have foreign countries and not American companies selling us oil for the next few decades?
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
Never say, I did not say we should be working together. Cooperation was possible with China, Cuba, Brazil and Venezuela and it still is! BP is doing it, and the Nowegians are doing it and they are not playing power politics. They are playing the game of mututal benefit without regard to the political orientation of the country. I do not see why we cannot do the same thing?

Easing the embargo on Cuba, while lifting our restrictions on drilling off our own coast. Getting Valero to take a more active role, and easing domestic demanding for natural gas through offshore wind and clean coal and alternative production at home for housing needs....Even if it means that it is worthwhile going into offshore areas around Russia where there is a shit load of untapped oil, or buying sugarcane from Brazil, Cuba and Venezuela in a sharing program. It is a hell of a lot better than being left out of all the important decisions that the world makes. We had a chance to make a great deal with the Indian oil companies and we let it go for political reasons....We have a chance to really assist in the development of the Americas if we take the pan-American approach of Jefferson or the good neighbor approach of FDR. That is why I was scraeming about chaning policy, I was hoping we would not have to see the the day when a big country or UNASUR decides it needs to protect its interests to the exlcusion of ours. Have we completely forgotten Jefferson's and FDR's policies? These words "peaceful commerce with all, entagling alliances with none..." does that mean anything anymore? How much prosperity and peace are we willing to sacrifice to maintain a hostile position toward our neighbors to the south?
June 4, 2008 at 7:00 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...
22 comments
Read more

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...
26 comments
Read more