Skip to main content

The advantage that Bob Barr threw away: down-ticket Libertarians

Independent Political Report notes in a round-up of poll numbers that Bob Barr is pulling down 3% in North Carolina and "just under" 5% in Texas.

Although it has generally escaped comment, this is the latest evidence that down-ticket Libertarians are carrying Bob Barr on their coat-tails, and not the other way around.

Let's think this through. Here are the most recent numbers for the three prominent LP candidates in North Carolina:

Senate: Chris Cole--7%

Governor: Mike Munger--5%

President: Bob Barr--3%

North Carolina, by the way, is where we have Bob Barr on record claiming in a radio interview that his candidacy would prove to be a boon for (wait for it) . . . down-ticket Republicans.

In Texas, the Libertarian Party has been surging into the 5%-range across the State for months, prompting GOP pressure on LP candidates to drop out of State House races, because in 5 or 6 key districts the LP vote may cause previously safe Republican seats to be in jeopardy.

The Barr effect? Hardly. Just take a look at Libertarian performance in the Lone Star State in 2006 (when Barr's self-named PAC was still funneling money to GOPers around the country):

Congressional District 22
Bob Smither (L) - 6.06%

State House District 17
Roderick (Rod) Gibbs (L) - 3.19%

State House District 35
Edward Elmer (L) - 5.35%

State House District 47
Yvonne Schick (L) - 4.22%

State House District 50
Jerry Chandler (L) - 4.65%

State House District 52
Lillian Simmons (L) - 5.26%

State House District 85
David K. Schumacher (L) - 2.72%


So if Bob Barr is polling "just under" 5% in Texas, he appears again to be riding on the backs of down-ticket Libertarians.

Imagine what might have been possible had either the Barr campaign or national LP headquarters actually paid attention to this phenomena.

Maybe next time.

Comments

The Last Ephor said…
Bob Barr believes in only one thing: that Bob Barr should be in office somewhere instead of getting a real job.
Anonymous said…
I've been watchign these campaigns for 20 years, and down ticket libertarians almost always poll higher than the presidential candidate. The reason is the phenomena of 'throwing your vote away'. People don't care about down tickets and are willing to protest there. Also sometimes down ticket candidates only have 1 major party running, in which case the lp candidate really skyrockets to 25% or so.

Anyway, this is nothing new. Every 4 years, the LP explodes in and self destructs in an ego fest.

It happens in every party, not to criticise the LP. Democrats have their PUMA (project unity my ass), republicans had Ann Coulter who said McCain was so bad she'd have to endorse Clinton first.

But Libertarians are idealists and political neophytes for the most part who join and then get disulliosned and take all this to heart, instead of taking the long view, that this is the nature of the political beast.

Bob Barr is one of the best candidates we've had. Of course, smaller parties like the Constitution party, cannot make any headway in the general electorate, so they spend their entire campaign trying to poach LP support. OF COURSE...it was always this way, and its true for LP too, its why we spent our entire campaign trying to get Ron Paul voters. Its darn near impossible to get Joe6Pack to care about anything.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...