Skip to main content

Because government is obviously needed to protect us from bad interior decorators. . . .

. . . you should read this post from Coyote Blogregarding licensing.

Progressives and liberals (sorry, I am now required to distinguish between you) will probably tut-tut and chortle over stupid laws that are a fairly harmless by-product of the regulatory society they promote.

Conservatives aren't allowed by the GOP platform to consult with interior decorators, anyway.

Only Libertarians (and most people who actually have to purchase products and services at inflated prices because the providers have to pay protection money to the State), will read this and see no humor at all:

In Alabama it is illegal to recommend shades of paint without a license. In Nevada it is illegal to move any large piece of furniture for purposes of design without a license. In fact, hundreds of people have been prosecuted in Alabama and Nevada for practicing "interior design" without a license. Getting a license is no easy task, typically requiring at least 4 years of education and 2 years of apprenticeship. Why do we need licenses laws for interior designers? According to the American Society of Interior Designers (ASID) because,

Every decision an interior designer makes in one way or another affects the health, safety, and welfare of the public.


This hardly passes the laugh test. Moreover as Carpenter and Ross point out in an excellent article in Regulation from which I have drawn:

In more than 30 years of advocating for regulation, the ASID and its ilk have yet to identify a single documented incident resulting in harm to anyone from the unlicensed practice of interior design...These laws simply have nothing to do with protecting the public.



Read the entire post, and the comments, and get depressed. More of this kind of idiocy is what the next election will bring, no matter who becomes President.
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
I agree that forcing certification by law is a dumb idea, a really dumb idea. All it really is is a way for the state to raise money from license fees.

However, I see nothing wrong with Interior Designers setting up a certification process for themselves. It probably helps the profession.

Anyway, I know this wasn't the point of your post, but I don't know how far you libertarians take things. :-)
August 19, 2008 at 10:40 AM
Steven H. Newton said…
nemski
I am beginning to think you are an unconscious libertarian.

That's exactly the libertarian solution: credentialling, not liscensing.

The point is to provide consumers with information and let them make their own choices.
August 19, 2008 at 10:45 AM
Anonymous said…
And you can bet that the current interior designers support these efforts -- they just won't admit it's because this system reduces competition and keeps their prices high. Looters, the lot of them.
August 19, 2008 at 2:28 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?
1 comment
Read more

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici...
Post a Comment
Read more

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...
70 comments
Read more