Skip to main content

I think this is interesting: NC Gubernatorial candidates release health and financial profiles

These are the summaries for the health and financial profiles of the three ballot-qualified candidates for North Carolina governor.

Note that only Dr Mike Munger responded to the request to provide his tax returns. Bev Perdue and Pat McCrory hid behind their required financial disclosure forms, which are much less specific.

That said, here are the profiles, as published by the Raleigh News & Observer:

BEV PERDUE, DEMOCRAT
Health: Perdue, 61, has been "in excellent health," according to a letter from Dr. Neil Bender of Jones County, her physician since 2001. She has high blood pressure, for which she has taken two prescription medications, and high cholesterol that she has treated with diet, exercise and weight loss, Bender wrote.

She smoked off and on from college until 2003, when she started working with teen anti-tobacco programs. "She never smoked a lot," spokesman David Kochman wrote in an e-mail message.

Finances: Perdue has held elected office continuously since 1987, the first 14 years as a state legislator. She has worked as a teacher, hospital administrator and consultant. Her salary as lieutenant governor is $123,198. On her state ethics form, she reports income of more than $5,000 from at least five other separate sources.

She reports interests of at least $10,000 in about 60 publicly traded companies and in four privately held companies, including a Craven County developer. Her husband, Bob Eaves, has interests in several other companies, including a convenience store chain. They report four separate liabilities of at least $10,000 to commercial banks. They own homes in Chapel Hill and New Bern.

MIKE MUNGER, LIBERTARIAN
Health: Munger, 49, described no serious health concerns. He has had high blood pressure, which he treats with prescription medication, since he was about 30. He reported a series of injuries -- mostly sports-related -- including sprained ankles, separated shoulders and a dislocated kneecap.

He said he had shoulder surgery in 2000 to repair a torn rotator cuff and to shave down part of a bone. "If it sounds painful, it is," he wrote in an e-mail message.

Finances: The only candidate to provide a tax return, Munger and his wife, Donna, reported $254,000 in combined taxable income in 2006. Their federal tax was $67,000, though they overpaid in both 2005 and 2006 and applied $8,000 to their 2007 tax bill. They reported giving $6,000 to charity.

Munger is a Duke University political scientist. His wife is a government lawyer. Their income also includes book royalties, speaking fees and logging income from property in Chatham County. On his ethics form, he reported no other business holdings of $10,000 or more. They own a house in Raleigh.

PAT MCCRORY, REPUBLICAN
Health: McCrory, 51, has been "consistently in excellent health," according to a letter from Dr. Robert Heyer of Charlotte, his physician since 1996. McCrory had successful knee surgery in 1996. "He has normal blood pressure and no evidence of cardiovascular disease," Heyer wrote.

Despite repeated questions, McCrory's campaign would not say with certainty whether he is taking any prescription medications or has taken any recently.

Spokeswoman Amy Auth said he was not, "to my knowledge."

Finances: McCrory worked at Duke Energy for 29 years before leaving to run for governor. He held several managerial positions and never disclosed how much he made. On his state ethics form, he reports his mayoral salary as the only other income of more than $5,000 for him or his wife, Ann. The salary is almost $40,000 this year.

He reported his Charlotte home as his only property. He reported no business holdings of $10,000 or more, but the ethics form does not require mutual fund holdings.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...