Skip to main content

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 3

The LNC is broke, and circling the drain at dizzying speed.

It recently sent the following (illiterate) letter to its membership:

Letter from Bill Redpath

Printed on yellow paper, with sentence fragments, poor punctuation and general illiteracy, the letter begs for cash:

WE'RE IN TROUBLE! Contribution drop-off happens after every election. BUT NOT LIKE THIS.

Post-election letdown plus economic crisis has brought contributions to a screeching halt.


What a surprise.

Perhaps Wayne Allyn Root could dip into his "millions" to fund an LNC "resurgence."

Or perhaps Bob Barr could still deliver on his $40 million to $50 million in new campaign funds promise from the Denver convention.

Failing that, of course, perhaps Daniel Imperato could hit up his friends at the Knights Templar for a couple million.

Worst of all, Mr. Redpath's letter asks for $150, $100 or $75 -- truly "povertarian" amounts! They must be hurtin'.

There's rent to the Watergate to pay... newsletters to cancel... Republican campaigns to fund... be sure to send in your cash to Bill today!

Or not.

Comments

One recalls Mr Root promising his buzillionaire gambling pals would contribute a buzillion dollars to the Bob Barr Shave the Stache Fund.

You could look it up.
Brian Miller said…
I don't understand how all those gazillions could dry up so quickly!

It's almost as though all the neoconservative bullshit has chased off all the real libertarians, who stopped donating or caring about the LNC in the wake of all the neocon nonsense or something...

Perhaps Brian Holtz could come through with a few hundred grand?
paulie said…
Funny, I don't remember getting one. Maybe I just forgot?

Anyway, maybe you're right, and we need to just ignore the LNC since it is not getting much accomplished, focus on doing those things ourselves outside of the LNC, and then maybe - if we think it's worth it - bring some people to St. Louis; and if we don't, we can continue to function independently. What do you say?
paulie said…
B] As for the "nobody gets LGBT in Alabama," please don't even bother with that argument. Outright was founded in the Southeastern United States -- a plurality of its membership, and a great deal of its leadership is based there. Our national chair Rob Power is from Tennessee. We know all about rural southeastern lobbying around LGBT issues because we do it everyday -- more than our Republican and Democratic counterparts.


p] Right on. Any info that you want to pass along for what has worked in that regard in Tennessee or other surrounding states would be appreciated by the Alabama party. And thank you for you work!


B] At this point, I am chronicling the end of the Libertarian National Committee as we know it.

B] A large number of people are being "quiet," and/or "nice" in order to preserve their status in an institution that's hit an iceberg and taking on water.


p] Not me. I have extremely low status, if any at all (just ask Sean Haugh). I'm more interested in moving the cause of liberty forward than whether the LNC survives, dies, or changes from a lizard to a butterfly. I don't care which party does it, or if we do it in some way that does not involve a political party.

p] If the LNC is failing to get that job done, let's organize other committees to fulfill specific tasks that they are failing to do. Here is one:

http://freedomballotaccess.org/


We have both petitioners and telephone fundraisers ready to go, and one state we have already contracted with. We need lists of people for our fundraisers to call, and any help in that regard would be appreciated - as, of course, would actual contributions by anyone reading. If anyone reading has a personal beef with the folks at Freedom Ballot Access, you can donate to the Alabama Libertarian Party instead, or to the West Virginia Libertarian Party. Hopefully more states soon.

Here is another one:

College Libertarian Organizing Committee

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2421661756


http://pauliecannoli.wordpress.com/2007/08/03/college-libertarian-organizing-committee-2/



p] Most recently I have talked to WV LP chair Matt Harris. He has experience filing 501c3 paperwork and is willing to do so if anyone here (or anywhere else) is willing to kick in $300 to cover the filing fees.



B] The Libertarian Party no longer has credibility with a large swathe of the freedom movement. It no longer has credibility with audiences that once respected it. To the degree that it has preserved SOME credibility, it has done so at the cost of the integrity of individual Libertarians, who have danced fast and loose to spin the Barr/Root ticket as a "boon for freedom" to a very skeptical media.

B] Speaking of media, how many media releases from LNC headquarters get published in major media? Or even niche non-libertarian media? None. Outright, which is smaller and less well-funded, got 47 media sources to cover the Barr campaign. Funnily enough, we did it by using the proper appellations for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people (the latter two groups aren't even covered by the term "homosexual.")

p] OK. Please share as much knowledge as possible about what has worked for you in terms of getting media coverage. I've told you - I think it was several months ago - that I am available to help in these media efforts, which can also be a separate committee which is organized separately from the LNC by self-selected volunteers. If you don't want my help, that's OK. But I haven't seen any public call for other interested people to help, so for all you know you may have all sorts of would be volunteers that just have not been asked.


B] Finally, yes, Paulie, if you had orchestrated the nomination of Cindy Sheehan as LNC nominee for president, participated in an effort to remove the economic freedom planks from our platform AND were sitting on our platform committee while prominently displaying a "Workers' World Weekly" banner on your web site, I'd be equally critical.

p] OK, Comrade Miller, I'll keep that in mind for when I do exactly that in 2012. LOL. In the meantime, can we please devote 10% of the time we are currently spending discussing what the LNC is NOT doing, and ...um...just do it ourselves, maybe? Even though some people think I'm a communist, and some people think my friend Steve Gordon is a homophobic Republican, maybe all of us can find a few issues we can agree on and actually do something to move the ball down the field on those issues?


B] Let's revisit the situation in 12 months and see just where the LNC is. It's an organization dependent on donations of discretionary income, running short of cash at the start of a brutal recession, chasing away longtime members, seeing its budget shrink to a tiny fraction of where it was in the Browne campaign days, engaged in meaningless internal debates without a single major policy idea or statement to deal with ANY of the nation's challenges. It ran a neocon ticket with a neocon platform that a majority of American small-l libertarians couldn't get behind. And it's still focused inwardly, even as it implodes. Calling out the problems in a public forum represents the last opportunity many of us have to try and arrest the death spiral -- certainly, none of "our" LNC reps or staff take our calls or emails, since they're busy courting the GOP or plotting against other members of their body.

Cheers,

Brian


p] Yeah, we could do that. Or we could just do what we think the LNC should be doing, without all the bureaucracy, and maybe even have half a chance of derailing the cattle cars before they arrive to take us to the FEMA camps.

One love,

Convicted criminal comrade paulie (CCCP)
PlanetaryJim said…
Does anyone still *not* know how to derail a cattle car?
George Donnelly said…
That's just a fundraising gimmick. It doesn't necessarily convey what Mr Redpath considers to be the current reality of the national LP.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...