Skip to main content

DNREC: The left hand and the right hand

There is a brief, bland reference in today's News Journal to the Delaware City train derailment story I got from Jen Wallace of the Green Party yesterday:
Also sought is a clarification of rules for reporting problems, mishaps or spills at the refinery’s new crude-by-rail loading and unloading operation. Four cars derailed during a weekend accident at the new facility late last month, but no public notice was required because none of the tanks leaked.
Now we could go into the rationalizations provided by PBF Energy or the criticism of their behavior by the Sierra Club and other environmental groups, but that's too easy.

Instead, let's go to DNREC.

Yesterday Jen Wallace let me know, well before noon, that Ravi Rangan of DNREC had confirmed that the derailment had occurred, and also confirmed other details, such as PBF Energy being unprepared to get the cars back on the tracks without waiting hours for equipment from out of state.

So, curious, I called the DNREC Public Information number and asked about the incident, just to see what the spin would be.

The spin:  "I haven't heard anything about that.  I'll have to check and get back to you."

Still waiting.

With a little luck, the DNREC Public Information Officer might actually read today's newspaper and call me up to tell me about the derailment that, for some strange reason, she couldn't find out about even after other DNREC officials had already publicly confirmed it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and