Skip to main content

Surprise, surprise (not): Jack Markell wants $80 million in new (regressive) taxes

So the Governor waits until there are only 2 1/2 weeks left in the legislative session and provides lawmakers a "menu" of new taxes to choose from?

My favorites are a hike in the gas tax and a near doubling of the motor vehicle transfer tax.

Now, of course Libertarians oppose taxes like this almost by reflex, but what's amazing to find is that even our brethren and cistern (yes, I spelled it that way consistently) in the Democratic Party are beginning to discover that this Governor is no particular friend of theirs despite socially "progressive" stands on gun control, marriage equality, and trans-gender rights:

Gov. Jack Markell has offered legislators a selection of more than $80 million in tax and fee increases to spend on roads, beaches, parks and waterways, but already lawmakers are rejecting some of the ideas. 
Markell included a 5-cent increase in the gasoline tax that would raise it to 28 cents along with a range of other options for lawmakers to consider. But Democratic leaders in both chambers said Wednesday that there was little appetite among lawmakers to increase the tax.
Aside from the fact that this is budgetary management failure so bad that you'd think Ruth Ann Minner had just been appointed as Markell's budget advisor, it is particularly ham-handed to introduce new taxes not just this late but after (a) you've already cut taxes for high-income Delawareans this year; and (b) you couldn't have picked two more regressive or economically harmful taxes to pimp for.

With gas averaging around $3.50/gallon, who do you think an additional 5 cents is going to hurt most?

Uh, let's see--people in Greenville or people in Marshallton?

And who do you think is going to be deterred from buying a new car by a massive increase in the transfer tax?

Gee, I don't know?  People buying their second Mercedes, or young people and low income people who just need reliable transportation to their jobs to keep their families afloat?

While I would argue that almost all taxes are by nature regressive, Governor Markell could not have picked out two better examples of taxes that will hurt the poor and middle class in Delaware if he tried.

But, then, his education policy pretty much tells you what he thinks of the poor and middle-class, anyway, so I guess this isn't a big surprise.

Comments

tom said…
The General Assembly should respond with $80 million in Spending Cuts.

They could just go for the easy and obvious things like eliminating the Strategic Fund and the Reichssicherheitshauptamt.

Or they could do something creative like cutting $80 million from the salaries & benefits of Markell Administration officials, starting from the top.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and