Skip to main content

Libertarians supporting raw milk and midwives today in Dover

Sometimes lost in the shuffle over high-profile bills on topics like gun control, LGBT issues, or charters schools are a lot of other freedom-related issues that Libertarians are the only political party fully supporting.

Photo courtesy
Margie McKeown
For example, today in Dover advocates for HB 150 (legalization of raw milk sales) and against HB 194 (further outlawing midwives in Delaware) joined together to do some citizen lobbying at the General Assembly.

The LPD's Kent County Chair, Margie McKeown, is not only personally involved in both causes, but is getting the word out that the Libertarian Party is the only political party in Delaware that unequivocally and publicly supports both causes.

Here (lightly edited to allow for typing on FB on her phone) is her report:
The raw milk bill failed today. It was 26-14 1 absent. We left after 6:30 pm and the midwife bill still hadn't gone to the floor. They caucused after 2 bills for a very long time, pushing the other bills back to this evening. I talked to SO many people today. I made sure everyone I talked to the folks that  were in support of raw milk to the home birth so that they knew that the Libertarian Party supports both of these issues. I had at least 2 people say they are changing parties, and invited a few to our Kent County LPD meeting. I also gave contact info for David Eisenhour down in Sussex.  
Photo courtesy Margie McKeown
As far as the midwife bill, they were talking about limiting the penalty for a first offence to a cease and desist order instead of a felony charge, which was what this original bill did. [This amendment did pass.]  They were also talking about a panel to discuss it, but since they don't give midwives licenses... it sets them up to break the law.  When this was brought to some of the legislators' attention, they said they wanted to give the bill and info that we passed out a second look. 
Margie and future astro-physicist/
politician taking a stand

All and all we had a pretty good day. My daughter is a little tired, but she's a real trooper! She actually enjoyed watching the legislative process... Astro- physicist/ politician?? haha!


Now here is the breakdown on the two bills, so that Libertarians thinking about running in 2014 know who was for and against.



As far as HB 150 it was obviously not a down-the-line party vote:

On the other hand, on HB 194 it was a straight, down-the-line Demopublican/Republicrat unanimous assertion of State power over your decisions.



Here there is something particularly important to note:

This is the synopsis of HB 194:
This Legislation aligns the penalty for non-compliance with the non-nurse midwives law and regulations with the penalty for practicing medicine without a license.  It imposes civil and/or criminal penalties for violations of existing law.  The increase in penalties is necessary because people are acting in violation of current law and regulations and as such are exposing mothers and newborn infants to significant risk and harm.
This last sentence is either (take your choice) (a) propaganda and/or (b) an utter and absolute crock.

Ethical midwives (and I've met many and none who were not) will not attend a high-risk birth, and are very careful to lay out exactly the risks and benefits of any home birth.  There is no solid statistical evidence that in low risk pregnancies there is any greater danger to the mother or child when the birth is managed by a competent midwife.

Ironically, paramedics and just plain citizens assist in out-of-hospital births by the thousands each year, and their success record is good (and they are not held liable to criminal or civil penalties for so doing). Logic tells us that a low-risk birth in a home environment under the management of a competent midwife is much more safe than an impromptu birth beside the road somewhere being handled by an EMT whose total experience is having watched a single training video several years ago.

This is the message for those of you support raw milk and midwives, but have not investigated the Libertarian Party of Delaware:  we are on your side, and we will advocate for you.

Go here to find out when the next meeting occurs in your area; we'd love to meet you and talk about how we can help organize support.

You can also hook up with us via the Libertarian Party of Delaware Facebook page.

While you're at it, if so inclined, please visit our donation/subscription page.  We are planning to run candidates in just about every House race next year, and we will make these issues a factor in those races.  But we also need help doing so because special interests (big dairy conglomerates and medical societies) do not use their PACs to funnel thousands of dollars behind our candidates.  We have to do it ourselves.  So we are asking folks if they can afford a $5-$10/month subscription pledge.  With 100 people pledging $5/month our Executive Committee will have at least $6,000 to support our most competitive candidates.

If we can (and we think it's possible in 2014 and even likely in 2016) win a single seat in the House of Representatives, we can break the two-party hold on legislation and laws in Delaware, and change the game toward more individual freedom.

Please consider joining us.

For your $5 a month, think about this:  how much coverage and support have the Democrats or Republicans given to raw milk or home birth?

Comments

Anonymous said…
I learn about the mid-wife legislation while in Dover supporting the raw milk bill. While I support the cause, I find your comment about "an EMT who has watched a single training video" insulting. As a PARAMEDIC in Delaware, I can assure you the we have much more training than you give use credit for.
You may. However, having been both an EMT and a shock/trauma tech in the military and civilian world, and having talked with such folks around the country, actually being prepared to assist in a live birth is much more the exception than the rule.
Heather said…
Thank you so much for your post and your support. We had a great time chatting with Margie yesterday about homebirth, raw milk, even a bit about homeschooling, family size and farming.
I just wanted to stop by and say hi and share our website/ blog, and looking forward to working together in the future.
http://delawarefamiliesforsafebirth.org/

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...