Skip to main content

So many of my liberal friends keep telling me that President Obama knows what he's doing ...

... that I have to wonder how they are going to rationalize this:

This is something we've never seen from aDemocratic president: An official White Housebudget that includes cuts to both Social Security and Medicare.
White House officials say the budget the president will unveil next week will include proposed cuts to Medicare (by increasing premiums for wealthier retirees) and Social Security (by reducing annual cost of living increases).
Give Jonathan Karl at ABC News credit--he tries to find something that liberals and progressives might consider to be redeeming in the package:
And that is a significant change that will open the president up to criticism from liberals and put pressure on Republicans to offer a response. 
Color me f--king curious, but can anybody explain precisely how giving GOPers in the House cuts in Social Security and Medicare before they've put a single tax increase on the table is going to put pressure on them?

[That's a purely political process question, by the way.  I really don't have a serious dog in the fight between the two most profligate spending political parties in the history of the planet, I'm just curious to see how much kool-aid my friends can gag down.  Apparently Tom Carper has far more the range of Mr. Obama's "Democratic" politics than Chris Coons, huh?]

Comments

delacrat said…
" I'm just curious to see how much kool-aid my [liberal] friends can gag down.

... that I have to wonder how they are going to rationalize this:

This is something we've never seen from a Democratic president: An official White House budget that includes cuts to both Social Security and Medicare."

Steve,

Your "liberal" friends will not try to rationalize it.

It will be as much a topic of debate, comment, discussion or mention as indefinite detention without legal process or droning US citizens without the same. Which is to say, none at all.

Now, there is a lively debate on His sexist remarks about California Attorney General Kamala Harris, a truly important matter.

http://www.delawareliberal.net/2013/04/05/i-read-it-as-a-joke-others-read-it-as-a-vile-sexist-attack-your-thoughts/#comment-339401

" I really don't have a serious dog in the fight..."

Since SS and Medicare cuts will diminish your (and your kids) well-being when you are all too old to work, you really do "have a serious dog in the fight".
April 5, 2013 at 9:47 PM
tom said…
"Since SS and Medicare cuts will diminish your (and your kids) well-being when you are all too old to work, you really do "have a serious dog in the fight""

Not bloody likely.

I suspect that Steve, like anyone else w/ a decent job and a clue, did his retirement planning around the idea that the government can not be depended upon and that SS will provide, at best, a small supplemental income stream.
April 6, 2013 at 2:43 AM
kavips said…
I'd have to say I yet have only rumors and not enough information to make any worthwhile comments.

I could make lots of comments, of course, but they wouldn't be worthwhile....
April 6, 2013 at 1:15 PM
Anonymous said…
YAWWWNNN ZZZZZZZZZZ
April 6, 2013 at 8:06 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?
1 comment
Read more

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici...
Post a Comment
Read more

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...
70 comments
Read more