Skip to main content

More from Strange Maps: the liberating power of Stalinist Marxism

Ever since A Secondhand Conjecture turned me on to Strange Maps, I have been plumbing their archives, and have found some incredible stuff. (Hube, you've really got to go there and take a look, man.)

Below is a night satellite shot of North and South Korea. The South, of course, is home to a despicable capitalist engine producing Hyundai automobiles and all sorts of other things that give rise to a country with severe income disparities and lots of social turbulence.

North Korea is one of the few remaining true Stalinist paradises on Earth (even the Chinese have been corrupted), where men are men (but have bad hair cuts), the peasants are self-reliant (and eat the bark off the trees), and the women are nearly 11 centimeters shorter (that's a little over four inches for those of you holding out for the English system) than their counterparts in the capitalist South. (Be sure not just to look at the map, but visit the original post at Strange Maps and read the whole article.)

By the way, the big blob in northwest South Korea is Seoul (23 million budding entrepreneurs); the only dot in North Korea is Pyongyang, with a population of 3 million. I remember Dan Rather commenting about ten years ago that when he went to Pyongyang to cover the nuclear issue, his tour guide told him that he must be a bigwig because his hotel suite had a light bulb in every room.

Comments

Anonymous said…
So when are we forcing them to switch to Compact Florescents?

Popular posts from this blog

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici...

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...