Skip to main content

OK, just to make it official: Dinesh D'Sousa IS an idiot

Not really worth reading, and I can't figure out why AOL keeps him around on a blog (much less promotes him on the home page), where pretty much all he does is shil for his own books.

The most typical lines in The Greatest African-American:

But now there are hardly any Bull Connors and Southern segregationists to fight, and so the activists are reduced to fighting "covert racism" and "institutional racism" and "racism that has gone underground" and basically racism that is only visible to them and to no one else....

The immigrants know that racism today is no longer systematic, it is episodic, and they are able to find ways to navigate around its obstacles....

At the time of his death King was peddling all kinds of impractical schemes for sharing the wealth and he also became unnecessarily involved in the anti-Vietnam movement which diluted his currency as a civil rights leader.


Does Dinesh really believe this crap, or is he (I hope) simply an amoral profiteer who's figured out that saying outrageous things (hello, Ann Coulter!) tricks some people into buying really vapid, meaningless books?

Comments

Bowly said…
I have to give him the systemic vs. episodic part. After all, the sheriff doesn't (typically) help in the lynchings anymore.
I would respectfully disagree.

Not all coercion is physical; nor is all systemic prejudice as obvious as a lynching.

Red-lining certainly still exists, as does significantly discrimination in housing, employment, and even retail service.

I won't say that there hasn't been progress, but to suggest that we've wiped out racism in this country is at best hyperbole.
D'Souza is one of those precocious young things, who, not having lived through a thing, can assure you it was all that bad.

I grew up in the South in the bad old days and while you don't have sheriff's conspiring with the Klan to murder people, there is plenty of racism.

People in the South have accomodated themselves to dealing pleasantly with black coworkers on the job, or being in the same public facilities. They've gotten used to black people occupying economic niches besides maids and warehousemen.

But they don't socialize together.They don't sit together in school lunch rooms. Indeed, look over much of the South and it's remarkable how schools have resegregated.

Members of the same denominations still have separate churches. Economic disparities are much the same by race.

Seeing the Democratic Party going sideways on race in the 1960s, Southern Democrats first went Wallacite, then Republican. Who gets worked up about poke-in-the-eye issues like Confederate state flags, making voting harder to do, welfare queens- it's all in code, like President Bush's recess appointments of appellate judges with dodgy prejudice issues in their confirmation records- on Martin Luther King Jr Day a year or two ago. Or Trent Lott's speech at Strom Thurmond's birthday party.

Indeed, lot of the effects of racism now are those of indifference. Like ward Conerly and other conservatives, the race question has been declared over. We don't have t think about it any more. Everyone is on his own and the genius of the market is that everyone gets an equal chance, and that charity from private sources will dole out mites to those who don't make it.

BTW- I was at a Christmas Party in Birmingham a few years ago. I met an interracial same-sex couple. They own Bull Connor's house. After they moved in, they went out to to Connor's grave, just to listen to him spin.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...