Skip to main content

Scientists report: Aliens avoid us because we're boring


Probably you'd expect this item in the Weekly World News rather than New Scientist, but there you are.

Yet there it is: "ET too bored by Earth transmissions to reply" [8 December 2006].

Canadian astrophysicist Yuvan Dutil and "fellow researcher" Stephane Davis posit the idea that sending out streams of mathematical data already known by any civilization sophisticated enough to receive our signals is a losing proposition.

"The question is, what is interesting to an extraterrestrial?" Dutil told New Scientist. "We think the answer is using some common ground to communicate things about humanity that will be new or different to them – like social features of our society."


Douglas Vakoch, who directs message compilation for SETI (the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence) agrees that we will need interesting message traffic to catch alien attention, but also points out some problems.

"If someone replies to your message saying, 'I don't understand. Can you repeat that?' it will take decades, centuries or millennia to know," says Vakoch.

"Another approach is to send a lot of stuff and hope there is enough redundancy for them to spot patterns," he adds. "We could just send the encyclopaedia."

Dutil agrees other options are worth exploring, but points out that sometimes only a message will do. "It would make sense to have an 'answer phone' message ready in case we are contacted," he explains, "just to say, 'we'll get back to you,' while we figure out what to do."


I was going to close this with some smart-ass suggestions of what to send--or better yet what NOT to send--but I think I can safely leave that to the creativity of the individual reader.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I think Dutil and Davis are nuts. Aliens would ignore the existence of another intelligent civilization ... because we're boring?? Puh-lease.

The only way this premise works is if intelligent life in the universe is as common as the common cold. And that is highly unlikely.
Unknown said…
IMHO, Hube is slightly lacking in imagination. Supposing we got a call from aliens, we would be over the moon. But if we got 10, it would fade from the front pages. If we got a million, would we bother to reply? After all, we could not meet them for thousands of years. There are trillions of stars and, probably, trillions of aliens. If they all tried to contact us, we would treat them like bugs - ignore them, or kill them - unless they killed us first. Sorry about that.
Regards Ross Milburn

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...