Skip to main content

Selling an Easy-Bake oven at a garage sale is now a crime

No, I'm not kidding:

WASHINGTON — If you're planning a garage sale or organizing a church bazaar, you'd best beware: You could be breaking a new federal law. As part of a campaign called Resale Roundup, the federal government is cracking down on the secondhand sales of dangerous and defective products.

The initiative, which targets toys and other products for children, enforces a new provision that makes it a crime to resell anything that's been recalled by its manufacturer.

"Those who resell recalled children's products are not only breaking the law, they are putting children's lives at risk," said Inez Tenenbaum, the recently confirmed chairwoman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

The crackdown affects sellers ranging from major thrift-store operators such as Goodwill and the Salvation Army to everyday Americans cleaning out their attics for yard sales, church bazaars or — increasingly — digital hawking on eBay, Craigslist and other Web sites.

Secondhand sellers now must keep abreast of recalls for thousands of products, some of them stretching back more than a decade, to stay within the bounds of the law.


Two popular children's items that can now get you arrested for trying to sell them: the Easy Bake Oven and Polly Pockets dolls.

Nanny loves you, you ungrateful bastards, and don't you forget it.

Comments

Where, in the sole ling you backstopped your item with, does it say anything about arrests?
Delaware Watch said…
Good law, unless, of course, you like a "free market" that sells dangerous items for children.

Why don't you write a piece that allows people to sell plastic bags filled w/ broken glass for children and show some consistency? Because that's about what your position amounts to.
Anonymous said…
Was broken glass in a plastic bag ever a product that there was a demand for ??

I can make the arguement that skate boards, baseball, sleds, and flying a kite are dangerous.

Delaware Watch would make them all illegal because he feels they are dangerous?
Delaware Watch said…
"I can make the arguement that skate boards, baseball, sleds, and flying a kite are dangerous."

Were any of these ever designated as defective products? If there is a TYPE or BRAND of, say, sled that is dangerous and determined to be defective, then it should not be sold for use.

You Libertarians are rather caviler when it comes to the safety of children.
Anonymous said…
OHMYGOD! these are dangerous toys! Would you want to buy one for your little kid if it was dangerous. The only way to stop these people from selling them is to outright ban the sale. Just saying, "that toy is dangerous, shouldnt buy it for your kid", doesnt get it. How many parents read the newspapers, or listen to the news? Free markets can be dangerous markets unless they are stopped.

Polly pockets have frickin lead in them. They should be banned from any sale...keep those lead loaded chinese toys coming folks... a little lead will make your child smarter!
Libertarian in Colorado said…
"You Libertarians are rather caviler when it comes to the safety of children."

I know this is going to come as a shocker. I hope you're sitting down. Perhaps, just maybe, i mean... is there a slight possibility that the parent could make that judgement on their own?

I know... there's that nutjob libertarian talk again. Sorry.

The "it's for the children" argument is like a
Godwin. The first person that pulls out "WHY WON'T YOU THINK OF THE CHILDREN!??!?!" should always automatically lose any argument.
Hube said…
There's a good comment discussion on this topic here.
Anonymous said…
I find it somewhat unreasonable to expect BillyBob and his toothless wife to know if the Easy Bake Oven that belonged to their Kool-Aid stained, inbred brats, that they're trying to sell at the annual trailer park yard sale, was subject to a 10 year old recall.
Does anyone happen to know how many kids actually died from an Easy Bake Oven? I don't seem to remember the outrage.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...