Skip to main content

How the blogosphere works (or doesn't)...

So two weeks ago Tyler Nixon announced here that Mike Castle was running for Congress and that he supports him.

No surprise there.

Then Delawaredem references that post in Around the Horn a couple days ago and throws off the comment that he'd like to know what I think.

I answered and explained why I'm not supporting Castle (or Biden).

Then Eric Dondero of Libertarian Republican drops by, sees my answer to DD's post, goes back to find Tyler's original post, and suddenly we have

Delaware's Top Libertarian Endorses Republican Mike Castle of US Senate

Political Stunner!!!!


And in the process, Delawareliberal even gets a mention in passing at Libertarian Republican. I know they will be so proud.

Several observations are important in this:

1) Despite Eric's connections to Delaware he somehow misses the fact that Tyler was a fusion Republican/Libertarian candidate in 2008, and that Tyler--while possessed of strong libertarian credentials--has been a registered Republican throughout his political career.

2) Tyler has never claimed the title of Delaware's Top Libertarian, although his combined vote total in last year's election between Republicans and Libertarians has arguably made him the most successfuly candidate associated with the Libertarian Party of Delaware.

3) It would only be a political stunner--as everyone in Delaware already knows--if Tyler Nixon did not support Mike Castle, since Tyler has worked to elect or re-elect Castle as Governor and Congressman in virtually every race in recent memory.

And, oh yes,

4) Contrary to Eric's reporting, I doubt Delawaredem would claim to be the publisher of Delawareliberal, per se.

All of which goes to show you that while almost everything Eric wrote in the post was factually correct, the combined assemblage of the story presents an erroneous image of a segment of Delaware politics.

I don't think that was anything peculiar to Eric's reporting: he did fairly reasonable due diligence and got all his quotes and links correct.

But it does raise the point that when you read local coverage of politics anywhere being interpreted by people who aren't actually on the scene and personally knowledgeable about the players, you should be carefully skeptical.

Comments

Delaware Dem said…
Hmmm. Look at the damage I caused.
Anonymous said…
Just so you all know.The folks over at Delaware Liberal are NOT all that liberal. Three times I have posted there and three times they took my comments down. Why because I actually had the guts to tell the truth about the demoratic party in Delaware. The party represented by corporate Delaware through the leadership of:Castle, Carper and Carney.Carney comes from the same ilk as Carper! Each and every time the so called libs have taken down my posts. So please allow me to post my comments re: Carney here.

Those libs actually believe that Carney would support "the public option". Could'nt be further from the truth.

Four years ago, when Carney was Lt. Governor and was in charge of the Delaware Health Commission, the Delaware Health Security Act was presented to the Del. Legislature. It was the Single payer bill sponsored by Harris McDowell and signed on by 18 legislators.

There are 32 statewide organizations who had signed on in support of this vital legislation. Many of the leaders of these organizations contacted Carney and asked to have Dr. Floyd McDowell and 2 other leaders present their findings and legislation to the Health care committee. Carney as Chair, began to load up that committee with every Chamber person and insurance company lobbyist he could find. He never invited Dr. Mcdowell nor any of the leaders of those organizations to present. Carney then goes on WILM and at least three people called in to ask him "why are you keeping Dr. McDowell from speaking". Carney replied with this absolute lie. "OH I have met with Floyd McDowell several times"...a bald faced lie. Carney was in the pockets of the insurance companies just like his protege Senator Tommy "I never miss a hand out from special interests, Carper".

Its a sham that Carper is introducing the Opt in/Opt out lets the states handle health care, when he knows very well, Delaware the First State will be the First State to OPTOUT.

If you libs think you have a real candidate for national office in Carney (the no nothing about foreign policy), the brat who worked his way through the party, and not the brightest bulb in the box, is going to do anything different than Carper...think again fools.

Carney will do whatever he has to do to get elected. He will sell his soul as has Carper and Castle to the highest special interest bidder.

Delaware should kick all these cats to the curb and elect a citizen who we KNOW works for the people...Scott Spencer.

Delaware Liberal proves every day they are in the pockets of the democratic party. They are not progressive thinkers they are not even liberals...they are in a nutshell selling the true liberals and progressives down the river while they support every special interest candidate.
Eric Dondero said…
Of course you're totally disregarding the way this looks from a national political perspective. How very narrow-minded of you. Of course, the Castle race is of uptmost importance to Delawareans. But it's got national implications, as well.

And from that national perspective, my piece was dead-on accurate.

I honestly don't think people on a national scale one bit whether Tyler was a Libertarian - Repubican fusion candidate, or of his past affiliations with the GOP.

What matters is that he's a very prominent Libertarian in your State, and he just endorsed Mike Castle, in a very critical race of national importance.
Eric Dondero said…
BTW, you act as though I don't read Delaware Libertarian. I followed your blog and most excellent campaign coverage all last year.

It'd be a real stretch to paint Tyler as a "partisan Republican," as you seem to now be doing. Understandably, that's about all you can do, cause, as I can imagine, this might be a bit of an embarrassment to you, and other left-leaning Libertarians in the State.

Eric Dondero, 1986 Libertarian Party candidate for Delaware State House of Reps
Eric
Try not to be more of an idiot than you have to be.

Far from being embarrassed by Tyler he is my co-blogger here at Delaware Libertarian. Supporting Mike Castle this year is one of the few political things he and I disagree about.

But even Tyler would tell you that he is a life-long Republican first; not an embarassment just a fact.

The only "fact" you got "wrong," and I said as much, is that Delawaredem is not the publisher of Delawareliberal.

You may visit here often, but you did miss Tyler's post or you would not have picked up that info from me.
tom said…
"2) Tyler has never claimed the title of Delaware's Top Libertarian, although his combined vote total in last year's election between Republicans and Libertarians has arguably made him the most successfuly candidate associated with the Libertarian Party of Delaware."

Last year maybe, but not in the history of the party. Both Peggy Schmidt and George Jurgenson, running as Libertarian only, got roughly twice his total votes, but they were running for statewide offices. John Reda got a higher percentage of the vote than Tyler as the Libertarian in a 3-way race for mayor of Elsmere.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?