Skip to main content

The problem with the new math in today's political discourse

My friends at Delawareliberal went all out describing Americans who did not believe that President Barack Obama did not deserve the Nobel Peace prize as wingnuts with no fewer than nine major posts.

The general theme was possibly best expressed by Delawaredem, who opined that when you have President Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize, you have the recipe for Peak Wingnut.

The only problem, CNN now reports, is that a majority of Americans (which would require a lot of Democrats to make up that majority, one presumes) don't think President Obama deserved the Nobel Peace prize:

About a third believe the president deserved the prize, according to this week's CNN/Opinion Research poll. Fifty-six percent say they disapprove of the Nobel Prize Committee's decision to honor him, the survey found.


This would appear to mean one of three things:

1) Americans in general reality test much better than our local liberal/progressive bloggers, and realize that the primary reason President Obama won the Nobel is because he is not George W. Bush.

2) GOP rhetoric is a lot more effective than they thought in influencing public opinion.

3) Polling only means something when it concludes what you wanted to believe in the first place.

Come to think of it: maybe it means all three things at the same time.

And maybe, just maybe, we will start to see some of President Obama's supporters begin to pay more careful attention to his increasingly ineffective while increasingly interventionist foreign policy.

Nah. Probably not going to happen.

Comments

Delaware Watch said…
"And maybe, just maybe, we will start to see some of President Obama's supporters begin to pay more careful attention to his increasingly ineffective while increasingly interventionist foreign policy."

It might help if we saw some convincing evidence for your claim. And I definitely mean something more convincing than this strained contrivance:

http://delawarelibertarian.blogspot.com/2009/10/continuing-militarization-of-american.html
Anonymous said…
The ignorance of the majority of Americans has been documented many many times.

I'd bet my house that over 80% of Americans couldn't name 5 other living Nobel Peace Prize winners. So what if 56% don't think he deserved it? You also conveniently left out that the same poll also found that "almost 70 percent saying they are proud an American president won it."

What you're missing is that most Americans celebrate when Americans are honored on the international stage and don't cheer and celebrate when America loses, like the republicans do.

Who can forget them cheering at their convention last year after the film celebrating the attacks on 9/11/01? Or cheering the selection of another country for the Olympics? Or thinking that Sarah Palin deserved being nominated for Vice President?

A post like this one is sheer demagoguery and you know it. And I write that as one who does not personally believe Obama deserved the award but am glad that he won it, nevertheless. I hope that it impacts his conscience and his actions in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the use of force in general.

anonone
Nancy Willing said…
I imagine that Americans think that the Peace Prize is supposed to only represent peace achieved. In the words of the committee, it has always recognized efforts towards increasing the potential of peace.

To the rest of the world, Bushco was so frightful, literally, that the Nobel is mostly an endorsement of American's choice of new leadership in someone who expressed the polar opposite of the horrors that had come before.

The main question is: who deserved it more? The Tibetan dissidents?

The Nobel is a symbol. I am sure glad they didn't give it to freakin' Bill Clinton.

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba