Skip to main content

Why it sometimes all seems to perplexing, as explained by one of our leading philosophers

I spend a lot of time reading Waldo and have developed such a vicarious appreciation of South Carolina politics that I am currently trying to figure out how to detour around the Palmetto State on my next trip from Delaware to Disney.

What Waldo teaches me (when whatever I am drinking is not spurting out of my nose) is that huge numbers of Americans who are otherwise apparently competent to dress themselves and drive to work every day are not really functioning at an intellectual level necessary to deal with the moral dilemma and cultural nuances of modern life.

Philosopher Daniel Dennett comes closer to explaining this phenomenon in brief academic terms than anyone else I have ever read [once you add one tiny fact to his explanation]:

There's a mismatch between the modern versus ancestral world. Our minds are equipped with programs that were evolved to navigate a small world of relatives, friends, and neighbors, not for cities and nation states of thousands or millions of anonymous people. Certain laws and institutions satisfy the moral intuitions these programs generate. But because these programs are now operating outside the envelope of environments for which they were designed, laws that satisfy the moral intuitions they generate may regularly fail to produce the outcomes we desire and anticipate that have the consequences we wish. ...


Here's the missing fact that associates with this phrase--Our minds are equipped with programs that were evolved to navigate a small world of relatives, friends, and neighbors:

That small world is essentially a tribal world, and recent anthropological studies have shown that, on a percentage basis, warfare in neolithic tribal societies was actually generated far more casualties than modern warfare.

Shorter Dennett: we still have not moved beyond the compelling urge to deal with people with different views by hitting them over the head with large sticks.

Comments

RSmitty said…
Know another reason to avoid SC when driving so many hours to-and-fro DE-FL? Don't get caught speeding on the interstate there. Yes, I was speeding, yepper...BUT I was within the flow of traffic. I wasn't passing, weaving, nothing. I was in the pack. The cop came up the left lane, then wedged in between my back and the front of the car behind me, siren-lights, pulled me over. Not the cars ahead of me, not the cars behind me, but me. One thing I noticed before pulling over, the car in front of me and the one next to it, in the left lane both had SC tags. I, of course, didn't, being a resident of Delaware.

He asked if I knew how fast I was going, which I honestly didn't, since I was travelling along in the pack. He said 89! That's pretty amazing, because I have one of those vehicles that gives you a shake if you touch 80, but hey, I am not about to argue with a cop when I am that far from home. He was "so nice" and let me off with an 84-MPH (so I wasn't 20 MPH over - 65 zone). Funny thing is, if you are 15+ over...MANDATORY COURT APPEARANCE! WTF? Sure, I can just make another trip to SC for freaking TRAFFIC COURT. Within three days...T-H-R-E-E days, I had solicitations for lawyers local to where I got the ticket. Amazing how quickly that turned around! I called a few, especially the one who enclosed a $100 off COUPON (I kid you not). I ultimately ended up with him. He said I didn't need to come down, but he'd represent me. He said they'd be able to plead it down to equipment malfunction (the speedometer, which was fine).

I thought about this. When they called me back to tell me it was successfully bargained down, I asked about this law and how typical it was for someone out of state to get nailed. The person from the law office was incredibly candid. She said in-state people are rarely charged with it (take that as either they are fully aware or...) and out-of-state people are so willing to avoid coming back, they will plead to higher charges than what I did and pay higher fines. She basically said that this was a racket targeted at the literally-ignorant, a.k.a.: out-of-state drivers. She said their office was one of many who were very much against the prosecution of this law in the first place, in that it was a point of embarrassment to have to deal with it and explain it to out-of-state collegues.
RSmitty said…
Crap, disregard all that...it was NORTH Carolina!!! D'oh!

Stupid Smitty, Fayetville is NORTH, not South. Man, I suck!

South Carolina is so groovy! Boo north!
Delaware Watch said…
Fortunately, evolution is not done with us. In an increasing global environment, my hope is that over time humanity will adapt and appreciate a more universal and humanitarian perspective.
RSmitty said…
Sorry for using only the opening paragraph for my last comment, btw.

On topic, I think Dennett and your extension are pretty much on target. Politics is a great example. I'd say look at the divide between Democrats and Republicans, but lets get even finer. Look at the divide within Republicans, the everything-coservative v the moderate-end. It's become so pathetic how it's all about the "team" winning over anything that has to do with principle. Hell, what does 'principle' have to do with anything politics in this age?
Anonymous said…
You're an optimist, Delaware Watch.

I think we've pretty much doomed all higher (multi-cellular) living things to extinction and will ultimately leave behind a planet utterly contaminated by deadly levels of radioactivity.

Evolution cannot happen when genes are constantly bombarded by radiation. Perhaps some single cell creatures living deep beneath the earth will eventually emerge to begin the evolutionary process again after the millions of years that will be required for the radioactive isotopes like plutonium to disappear.

Have a good day.

anonone
Miko said…
See also the TIMN organizational model.

Fortunately, evolution is not done with us. In an increasing global environment, my hope is that over time humanity will adapt and appreciate a more universal and humanitarian perspective.

I hope the opposite. Evolution works through death. The only way that this could happen would be if the government's current short-sighted policies led to the collapse of civilization and to billions of deaths. And since evolution is a slow process, this would probably be necessary multiple times. I'd much rather have humanity recognize our limitations and consiously adopt such a view before catastrophe forces us to adapt to it.

Evolution cannot happen when genes are constantly bombarded by radiation.

Sure it can. The sun is constantly bombarding us with radiation. It just has to be within certain levels.
Unknown said…
Miko, the TIMN Evolution Model deals with social evolution, which you seem to have overlooked.

Steve, Dennett's thesis makes sense to me, as I see this mentality on the Right all the time. I had hoped that Obama would be different on this point, but it is still too early to tell. His impending decisions on Afghanistan will be telling.

Smitty, my h/t to you to be forewarned regarding your driving experience in NC, as I drive IS 85 into Durham frequently, in the pack at 75-80 mph, past small towns that probably need the revenue now more than ever.
Anonymous said…
"...disregard all that...it was NORTH Carolina!!! D'oh!"

Don't worry, my daughter had a near identical experience in Virginia, and my brother in Georgia, so it's virtually everywhere south of Maryland. Apparently, she's still on the mailing list of some of the law firms that 'work with' the Va. State Police.

Miscreant

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...