Skip to main content

Secession crisis in Spain!?

To be clear, I believe that secessionist talk in the United States is an idea that is just as nutty now as it was in 2004, when some liberals proposed it, but divisive politics and a faltering economy create an atmosphere where lots of previously unthinkable things could happen.

Like in Spain:

Exit polls from the regional elections in Catalonia show that pro-independence parties are winning a huge majority: up to 95 of the 135 seats in the regional assembly, according to analysis from theFinancial Times. Worse, from Madrid’s point of view, the radical pro-independence forces are doing unexpectedly well. The next Catalan government will now be convinced that it has a mandate to hold a referendum on independence that Madrid says is illegal. 
In a worst case scenario, the provincial authorities will attempt a referendum that the national government tries to block. It will be interesting in such a case to see whether the police obey local authorities or listen to Madrid. At the moment, no one knows what comes next; there is zero trust between Barcelona and Madrid right now.

Comments

The Last Ephor said…
Why is a referendum a "worst case scenario"? Why is automatically assumed that secession is worse than the status quo?
Tyler Nixon said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Tyler Nixon said…
I think what's crazy talk is anything premise on the pure fantasy that either the geographic or political entity known as the United States is destined for eternal life, where just barely two centuries into its existence it has become mired in the excesses and evils of every other empire or would-be empire ruled by an orgy of clueless, thieving, out-of-control, distant, reality-detached autocrats.

I'm sure there were plenty of Germans round about 1940 who thought it was 'nutty' to dare even question the unstoppable reality of the "Thousand Year Reich", and I don't mean just nutty insofar as it was almost certainly fatal to even allude to such an idea.

With the utter lunatic asylum of borrowed profligacy and authoritarian statism that is now our federal utopia it is anything but nutty and I would say probably one of the only rational possibilities to ponder, the way things are so clearly headed.

That said, I can perhaps understand saying that the probability or likelihood (at least any time soon) of secession by any of the United States is a "nutty" idea.

But it is hard not to reject outright the assertion that mere discussion of it is nutty or, moreso, that this discussion and, more accurately, the last-resort leverage that it may and really SHOULD represent to our centralized control-freak super-state overseers, even just hypothetically, is anything but quite sane and eminently rational.

One's (inherently-subjective) opinion of the worth, credibility or sanity of any of the more vocal (or perhaps the not quite acceptably effete enough) of secession's present advocates does not change its value as a rational, logical matter.

I am sure "nutty" (or some other late 18th century lexiconic equivalent) was quite a fashionable epithet directed at those rebellious wackjobs who quite madly went about founding the United States in the face of overwhelming state force and a largely-craven majority of the populace.

It is hardly bizarre to think that self-governance, representative or otherwise, is anything but a sham unless ALL options (and resorts) are on the table.

Finally, I think it quite safe to say, at least on the basis of anything close to an accurate history of its intent and notwithstanding incessant gun-hating populace-disarming lefty tripe to the contrary, that the 2nd Amendment was hardly conceived to secure state protection for such eternal human rights rights as hunting or personal self-defense (not that they aren't just as much rights, as a purely existential/survival matter).

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?