Skip to main content

Why Republicans (in general, and in Delaware) should vote Libertarian this year

George Dance makes the point at Nolan Chart that, in order to force the GOP into a more libertarian stance, voting for Gary Johnson is the only thing that makes sense.

But, in Delaware, there are even better reasons to vote Libertarian than Republican.

Let me count the ways:

1.  If you vote Republican and you vote for any of the following candidates, your vote does not matter because those candidates are not going to come near enough to smell winning:

Mitt Romney/Paul Ryan
Jeff Cragg/Sher Valenzuela
Kevin Wade
Tom Kovach

Let's face it:  they have no chance.  There is an argument to be made for voting for Ben Mobley over Karin Weldin Stewart, and there are arguments in several districts that you might want to vote for Gregg Lavelle or Ernie Lopez (in the sense that your vote could actually help win the election), but on a statewide level the Republican Party is rapidly ceasing to be a contender.  So there is no wasted vote syndrome to contend with here.  The only way to truly waste your vote is with the DE GOP.

2.  If you vote Libertarian, your vote can make a positive change in the national political landscape.  If Gary Johnson/Jim Gray achieve 5% nationwide, the Libertarian Party achieves guaranteed ballot access in most states, and access to Federal matching funds next time around.  We could actually break open the two-party system with 5%.  But--to be bluntly honest--it will take a lot of libertarian-leaning Republican votes as well as independents and single-issue voters to do that.  I'm predicting over 2% for Johnson/Gray, which would blow the doors off previous Libertarian candidacies, including that turncoat twit Bob Barr.

3.  If you vote Libertarian, your vote can make a positive change in the political landscape in Delaware.    Polling over 5% for Scott Gesty in statewide races, or at above 10% for James Christina, or Margaret Melson, or Johnny Machurek, or David Eisenhour, or Ronnie Fitzgerald, or Amy Merlino or a dozen other Libertarian candidates will not only contribute to the continued rise of a socially tolerant, fiscally conservative, peace-oriented Libertarian Party, but it will force the GOP in Delaware to become more Libertarian . . . or die.

(And by the way, if you live in the district like I do that has been besieged by endless Mike Katz and Greg Lavelle flyers, you should vote for Marcia DaVinci Groff just because she didn't send any out.)

Delaware Republicans, over the last several years,  have been doing what the national party is doing, which is to say:  going the way of the Whigs  Which means out.  If you are a socially moderate GOPer, they do not want you around.  The Great Spaghetti Monster help you if you're LGBT, cause most of the Republicans in Delaware can't even stand to be in the same room with you.

This year, vote Libertarian, you Republicans.  You own party left you standing there with your pockets  hanging inside out.  Thank them by not voting

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...