Skip to main content

I must have hit the big time ... UPDATED--AGAIN--AND YET AGAIN!!!

... because now I have my own fan club.

In the first deft move, the standard bearer for IPOD in northern Delaware condemns a Libertarian rather than actually taking on, say, anybody in office.

The UPDATE:  it turns out that good old IPOD Jimmy has been adding people to his group without their knowledge.  One of them contacted me and asked to be removed from the photo.  I was happy to oblige, and if you are also listed here and did know he was using you for his infantile vendetta, please let me know.

The second UPDATE:  it turns out that IPOD Jimmy added more than one person without his or her knowledge.  That person has also contacted me and asked to be removed because they didn't know that this had happened.

The third UPDATE:  yet another person was added to this group without his or her knowledge.  It pretty much seems that once people discover the company they are keeping, they cannot wait to get out.

My fan club is apparently getting smaller and smaller each passing day.  Soon there will only be a single troll left.

Comments

Anonymous said…
@ Ass Clown newton. Jim is not a registered IPod. Get your facts straight.
April 21, 2013 at 12:37 AM
Anonymous said…
Really? How old is the person that started this page? No wonder this flipping state is a police state!! This is how it's citizens spend their time? Don't bother informing your friends and acquaintances of CISPA, gun control, the new health care legislation and the illegal search and seizures running rampant throughout the state. It's more important to make sure everyone knows that you think, "Newton is an Ass Clown". We're doomed! Sickening!
April 21, 2013 at 11:38 AM
Anonymous said…
The reason she asked to be taken off.... She doesn't want to be on your pathetic excuse of a blog.
No one in that group wants to be in your blog. Or asked you to put them in your blog.
So take us all of your blog.
April 21, 2013 at 9:43 PM
Anonymous said…
Off of your blog.
April 21, 2013 at 9:46 PM
Steven H. Newton said…
Here is what the young lady sent me via FB message with her name removed:

"i seen your blog on Delaware libertarian about hitting the big time im sorry but i have no clue why im in this some Jim guy added me to the group im sorry but can you please take your post down I've left the group if you want to redo the post im sorry for the trouble."

"Some guy named Jim" that she apparently doesn't even know.

So keep it up, son. I just publish the trash you create.
April 21, 2013 at 9:57 PM
Anonymous said…
More lies from the brave ass clown behind the computer.

Ok sport we all would like to be removed...

We don't want to be on your pathetic and trashy attempt of a blog... Got that sport?
April 22, 2013 at 10:18 AM
Steven H. Newton said…
I could care less what you want.

I removed a person you victimized by including without her consent. Anybody else who wants to message me personally and tell me they didn't give consent to join your little group, I will extend the same courtesy.

But the post stays where it is. You have no presumption of privacy for anything you put on Facebook.

I only hope the others are happy with the attention you've brought.

I'm happy with my pathetic little blog, thanks.
April 22, 2013 at 12:13 PM
Anonymous said…
What a big man you are... Let me buy you a pack of gum

I will show you how to chew it.
April 22, 2013 at 1:01 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...
70 comments
Read more

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...
31 comments
Read more