Skip to main content

DE Chamber of Commerce, DNREC: the sound of covering up environmental violations

You don't really have to take a side in the debate over the Audobon Society/Sierra Club vs PBF Energy/the Markell administration to hear the sound of a bureaucrat playing CYA because she knows the hearing before the Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board is going to turn up some violations.

It's just fun to listen to her squirm:

In a sign of how significant a ruling against the refinery would be, state Chamber of Commerce President Joan Verplanck has suggested tolerance if mistakes were made at Delaware City. She described the appeal as an “after the fact legal analysis that seeks to declare the refinery’s operations as illegal and shut down its business.” 
“I’m not saying that everyone should look the other way.The environment needs to be protected,” Verplanck said. “But you don’t have to do it with a flamethrower. Those are really hard jobs to get back. You really can’t play too fast and loose with that without risking the whole workforce.” 
Verplanck said that reports of uncertainty and potential risks to agreements that Delaware made with PBF could prove damaging to the state’s economic development efforts. 
“If there were indeed oversights made, it had to be in good faith on all sides. I think people were so genuinely appreciative of the fact that they could get the jobs back,” Verplanck said. 
“Maybe in the rush to do that, something did get missed. But is it an omission and not commission. Let’s treat it that way.”
Yep, good faith all around.  Look at how much "good faith" and governmental transparency there has been at DNREC:

The Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control last month hired a private attorney to assist the state in handling the case, but has declined to release Attorney General’s Office opinions on the original permit applications, and would not say whether the state’s attorneys found conflicts between the law and the refinery’s projects. 
I love it:  Secret legal opinions from the Office of the Attorney General have now moved down from the US Department of Justice (you don't get to see the rulings that said what NSA was doing is legal) to the Delaware Attorney General's Office.

Riddle me this?  The Delaware Attorney General is a "public servant."  Exactly how does Beau Biden's office get to issue opinions on compliance with State law that are secret?

 Never fear, however, the News Journal finds a way to spin this one in the very first paragraph so that the people fighting to enforce the law (the Coastal Zone Act) are suddenly the bad guys:

A high-stakes appeal threatens to stunt the sprawling Delaware City Refinery’s rail complex and lucrative ties to low-cost North American crude oil supplies, with a state board scheduled to hear concerns about the operation on July 16. 
Two environmental groups filed appeals June 14 seeking to have the refinery’s operation declared in violation of Delaware's 42 year old Coastal Zone Act, throwing future operation of the offloading site into question and jeopardizing PBF’s attempt to jointly supply and operate Delaware City and the Paulsboro, N.J., refinery.
Now if this is a neutral lead-in, then everything they are supposed to teach in journalism school (or would that be middle school for this generation's WNJ reporters?) is pretty much out the window.

When a citizen-backed attempt to enforce the law is characterized as threatening, then you don't have to agree with the complainants to realize that the fix is already pretty much in.

You see, Governor Markell appoints five of the nine members of the Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board and they serve "at the Governor's pleasure."  This means, as we found out a few weeks back in the great hospital hoax, that if the board does not rule the way Jack wants them to, he'll simply fire the members who vote against him and start over. 

When you ask why Libertarians don't trust the government, we can start with the fact that the people running the government refuse to play by the rules they set up for everyone else.


Comments

Nancy Willing said…
I am going to add this post to my post tonight -

http://delawareway.blogspot.com/2013/06/has-markells-administration-prepared.html

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...