Skip to main content

A bridge too sturdy?

[Couldn't resist, because the star-studded flop about World War Two's Arnhem operation, A Bridge Too Far should have been titled An Hour Too Long.]

Yep: the government sure is spending that stimulus money to beef up the crumbling bridges of America:

From AP:

In making the case that the recovery program was not just economically sound but also good policy, [VP Joe] Biden noted that transportation money was replacing unsafe bridges.

"It is worthwhile to take some of those 5,000 bridges out there that are ready to collapse, follow what happened in the upper Midwest, and fix them," he said.

But most states are spending stimulus money on bridges that are already in good shape, another AP analysis found. Of the 2,476 bridges scheduled to receive stimulus money so far, nearly half have passed inspections with high marks, according to federal data. Those 1,123 sound bridges received such high inspection ratings that they normally would not qualify for federal bridge money, yet they will share in more than $1.2 billion in stimulus money, the AP analysis published in July found.


My favorite stimulus stat, by the way, is that NASA has $1,002,000 set aside in the stimulus package, and thus far reports spending $102 of that total. What? Did they need a low-gravity toilet seat?

Comments

Miko said…
Given that Keynsianism's sole focus is increasing consumption by forcing people to spend money on things that they don't think are worth spending money on, it makes sense that most of the bridges being repaired wouldn't need repair. After all, if they had needed repair, we would have just repaired them without bothering to talk about stimulus.

How do you tell the difference between a Keynsian and a free-market economist? The Keynsian says that we have "underconsumption," whereas the free-marketer says that we have "overproduction." We free market supporters realize that production exists only to satisfy our desire for consumption; "underconsumption" is a misuse of language. The Keynsians are essentially shills for Big Business and are forcing us to buy stuff we don't want.
Tyler Nixon said…
Why are you such a naysayer, Steve? Don't you know there are more important issues on which to focus....like the Libertarian party platform on discrimination in commerce?

This administration is perfect for Biden and vice versa....it may well go down as the biggest running flim-flam scheme in U.S. history. But no matter what it must go down.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...