Skip to main content

How to cease being the world's superpower in two easy steps...

... in a post, by the way, that has nothing in particular to do with either Presidents Bush or Obama.

Step One: Borrow so much money from the Chinese that you are no longer allowed to criticize them, but they are empowered to critique your performance, hint that they can crash the dollar any time they so desire, and threaten to displace the dollar as the world's reserve currency....

Step Two: Swap out your dependence on Saudi oil with a dependence on petrochemical exports from greasy Vlad Putin's Russia:

Russia has taken center stage in oil exports. For the first time Russia has topped Saudi Arabia in oil exports. Russia exported about 7.4 million barrels per day in the first quarter compared with Saudi Arabia's 7 million barrels per day.

Russian supplies of energy to the US jumped 33% in the past six months compared with a drop of 29% for Saudi Arabia in the same period.


Short-term some folks see this as good news, because Russia currently needs petrodollars badly enough to want to undercut OPEC. Long-term, however, this means that both the wizened old men in Bejing and the once-and-future-Russian imperialists in Moscow will each have acquired a functional veto over US foreign policy....

Comments

tom said…
I'm feeling slow today.

Explain to me again why it would be a bad thing for the dollar to be replaced as the world's reserve currency. Particularly if it is replaced by a commodity backed currency such as gold, rather than some sort of SDR scam.
Libertarian in Colorado said…
Tom... in general it's not a bad thing. The problem is the terms in which it happens. If China decides that they want to crash the dollar one day, they can do it quite easily.

We can take steps to prevent them from being able to do that ourselves. But if we don't address the issue, and China decides to destroy the dollar, we'll really be up shit creek.

But, the conventional wisdom is that China would never start economic warfare with the United States. That wisdom is flawed.

If you want to see the US fall apart, destroy the dollar. They can't touch our military, but they can destroy us economically.

That would be their "nuclear option."
tom said…
China doesn't have to try to destroy the US$.

Congress and the Federal Reserve are doing it for them.
Libertarian in Colorado said…
That's not true. Not as long as there is a demand (which China is currently providing).

Congress and the Fed are performing a passive destruction. China is assisting. It's symbiotic. If China didn't buy dollars, it'd all go to hell.

Right now, the difference is that China is actively moving towards lessing the blow within their own borders by encouraging internal consumption. We're digging ourselves deeper in the whole by deficit spending.

Eventually, their nuclear option won't have mutually assured (economic) destruction as a deterrent for them.
tom said…
It is rumored that the Fed is keeping the illusion of demand up by purchasing up to half of all U.S. debt offerings via proxies.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?