Skip to main content

For Labor Day: King Vidor's "Our Daily Bread"

For the working people of America, slaves and immigrants, artisans and drill-press operators, at least once a year we can stand completely "above party"....

Celebrate Labor Day with one of the true American classics, King Vidor's 1934 Our Daily Bread [plot summary and critique here]. Aside from being an amazing film [the ditch-digging scene is justly one of the more famous segments in early American talking movies], it is a sentimental tribute to working people, immigrants, heartless capitalist bastards, and the success of cooperative labor.

To call it a paen to socialism is to underestimate what King Vidor was trying to accomplish, but what the hell.

As a political piece it is at best naive, but you can still get swept away with the passion, verve, and optimtism of King Vidor's vision, and--besides--the easy sensuality of Karen Morley still stands out more than seventy years later. [Morley died in 2003; checking her bio page I was astounded to discover that she was born in 1909 in Ottumwa IA--a town many viewers actually thought was made up as a hometown for Radar O-Reilly in MASH.]

OK, so she wasn't that believable either as the perennial loser's wife or the farmer's wife, who cares?

This is a movie, however, about what working people can accomplish--probably the seminal movie about that, and entertaining as hell to boot. Here are the first six of twelve segments: if you get hooked, you can find the remainder on YouTube.

[With thanks to Waldo, who first insisted I watch this movie in ... 1978.]





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...