Skip to main content

Firedog Lake: Political censorship in Delaware

Firedog Lake takes up both the Ralph Begleiter/UD debate exclusions of third parties and the Wilmington News Journal's refusal to publish candidate responses of third party candidates in its voter guide.

From a personal standpoint, here's the scoop on media and third parties in this state (from worst to best):

1.  The News Journal.  With the exception of the story about the UD debates, the News Journal has refused to cover any third party news other than Alex Pires.  They refused to print an announcement of the Libertarian VP candidate Jim Gray coming to DSU, despite the fact that they received press releases from both the LPD and DSU Public Relations.  Although I have several friends on staff at the WNJ, it has clearly been the most hostile major media outlet to third parties this cycle.  (I would give Delaware First Media this title, except that I don't consider them major media.)

2.  WDEL radio.  Some good news:  they invite all candidates to their debates.  Then the bad news:  for months their Electionwatch page was a complete and utter travesty, and the fact that I complained publicly about it is probably why it now lists IPOD and the Green Party but not the Libertarians.  Repeated requests to WDEL news and talk show hosts about the possibility of interviewing Jim Gray when he was here were not refused--they were just never answered.

In other words, two of the major media outlets in New Castle County simply refuse to cover third parties no matter what.

3.  Delaware State News.  Their platform is difficult to work with, but they have been much more willing to cover third parties than their cousins upstate.  A recent piece on the US House election focused on John Carney and Tom Kovach, but also gave considerable space to Libertarian Scott Gesty and Green Bernie August.  They covered the Libertarian/Republican controversy in the 32nd District between Will McVay and Ellis Parrott.

4.  WHYY television.  Co-sponsor of the debate with WDEL that allowed everybody in, and also did a ten-minute interview with Jim Gray when he was in Dover.

5.  WGMD radio.  WGMD News has been good about covering Libertarian press releases/news stories (and has proven capable of passing on my more "puff" efforts).  WGMD also covered the Sussex Libertarian Party Meet and Greet, and the staff there was trying to pull off an interview with Jim Gray but we couldn't make the logistics work.

But the grand prize goes to

6.  The Cape Gazette.  The CG has treated the Libertarian Party with total parity compared to the other political parties.  They ran an extensive article on our Libertarian candidates back in June, and have consistently been willing to pay as much attention to our press releases as they pay to the Democrats and Republicans.  For example, they have covered the following:

--Libertarians at the State Fair for Delaware marriage equality
--US House candidate Scott Gesty on education reform, ethanol mandates, and debate exclusions
--35th State Rep candidate Ronnie Fitzgerald receiving the endorsements of Delaware Right to Marry and the Delaware Liberty Fund

They have also been generous in printing letters from pro-Libertarian writers.  The interesting thing about the Cape Gazette is that they don't pick winners and losers for the voters--they seem to view their enterprise as informing people as much as possible about everything going on.

Damn shame other "news outlets" don't feel the same.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...