Skip to main content

If you claim to be a Libertarian, and you support Mitt Romney, here's even more evidence that one of you is an idiot

First, a nonsensical piece by yet another conservative GOPer hack (Brady Cremeens, rhymes with "cretin," I think) out to make all us Libertarians feel guilty that because they nominated an idiot, if we don't vote for him, it's our fault Barack Obama gets re-elected.

And the paragraph by paragraph refutation at United Liberty.

And now the reality:

Today Mitt Romney announced that he supports the Patriot Act, but he doesn't know enough about the NDAA to say whether or not he would support indefinite detention.  He also implied that he supports torture for information gathering.

Yeah, that's right.

I could tolerate a man who understood the issue and didn't agree with my position.  I could even respect him.

But what do you do with a guy who wants to be President who hasn't even (apparently) bothered to examine critical legislation?

I-d-i-o-t.

And if you support him?

Comments

delacrat said…
Steve, Romney's no idiot. It's not that Romney does not understand the NDAA. It's that he does not care what it says, for the simple reason that it does not impact him or his caste.
paulie said…
Will the real Willard please stand up?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=bxch-yi14BE
tom said…
I love it.

Where do these Jackasses come from?

This Election cycle, the GOP had not one, but two excellent chances to appeal to both libertarians and constitutional conservatives. Both were arguably exactly what the GOP needed to split Obama's support by reaching out to the anti-war, pro-freedom, anti-drug-war, LGBT and fiscally responsible factions of the Democratic party. But no, they couldn't heap enough scorn and derision on these candidates and their supporters.

they laughed Gary Johnson, who won two terms as Governor in an overwhelmingly liberal state right out of the Republican party (and straight to the Libertarians, who were happy to say "Welcome, you're one of us!"). Then they filed frivolous suits in state after state to waste our money by trying to kick us off the ballots.

with Ron Paul, they resorted to oughtright fraud, election tampering and other crimes prevent him and his supporters from having any say in the nomination process.

and now that they've nominated a candidate that few Republicans actually wanted, but most could accept as a tolerable 4th or 5th choice, they send these fools crying to us, begging, "please Libertarians, you have to vote for the pathetic loser we've nominated so he doesn't embarrass us. You have to vote for Mitt because he's not Obama (never mind that his voting record is the same, or that he supports the same failed policies)"

Well, this Libertarian isn't stupid. You didn't want our opinion when you were casting your lot for the loser you now want us to back, and you won't care about us the day after the election.

Go to Hell and take your lesser of evils, Mitt Romney, with you. I'm voting for Gary Johnson because he's by far the best person running for President this year.
Anonymous said…
What Tom said.+1
Anonymous said…
What Tom said +2


John Galt

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba