Skip to main content

Back in Action: The nightmare to come with single-payer in Delaware

Thanks to Scott Gesty for pointing me to this one, a Forbes write-up about the many problems with the former HB 932 (the Floyd McDowell "I'm going to saddle Delaware with this crap if I have to get it re-introduced three hundred times" bill), which Representatives Kowalko and Jacques have promised to bring back in January.

This article doesn't actually say anything that Libertarian critics like Jesse McVay and I didn't lay out in detail a few months back, but this is to a national audience, and the brevity of the article gives it punch.

Here's a snippet, but read the whole thing:
But worst of all, our healthcare will no longer be in our control. The Orwellian and non-elected “Authority” will dictate what kind of care Delawareans can and cannot have. Supplemental insurance, which we provide to our employees in other single-payer jurisdictions (i.e. Sweden and the UK), is outlawed by the bill. 
I'm betting that there are too many Democrats in the General Assembly to allow this crappy bill out of committee, but I'm not betting on that too heavily.

Comments

delacrat said…
In your agony of passing 4 kidney stones, you should have gained a better appreciation for the urgent need of a Medicare-For-All approach to health care.
i have no clue how you would come to that conclusion. I spent the time at home, took pain meds, and never saw a doctor. The pain meds I took are available for a $4 prescription at Wal-Mart.

Exactly how would this have made me yearn for Medicare for all?
delacrat said…
"...never saw a doctor. The pain meds I took are available for a $4 prescription at Wal-Mart."

If you did not see a doctor then, you were nevertheless under a doctor's care, if only remotely, because a prescription had to have been issued by a doctor.

Imagine passing those stones without a pain Rx, a fate libertarian ideologues would consign to those without employer-provided health insurance or the independently wealthy. Unlike "single-payer in Delaware", that's a real nightmare.
delacrat,
That's all really cute, but irrelevant. Let's count the ways:

1. Libertarians did not create the current health care system. We don't get elected, recall?

2. It's all very well and good for you to set up your "libertarian ideologue" straw men, but let's not pretend that what you are attempting to do has any intellectual validity. I've repeatedly made the case that there are multiple things that can be done to give greater access to health care to everyone without creating massive government bureaucracies. You just like to posture.

3. Nobody has to pass kidney stones now without that four dollar prescription. Current law allows them to go to an emergency room, get diagnosed, and get that prescription. Find me a few cases of people suffering from kidney stones because they could not get a prescription for Percosett. Otherwise STFU.

As for single-payer in Delaware, you don't have to be a libertarian to understand that (a) the funding mechanism doesn't work; (b) the population in the state is too low to support a stand-alone system; and (c) there are far too many services not even provided in Delaware (at any price) for single-payer to work. That's aside from the idiocy of "the Authority" and a vapid nonsense of basing the entire fraud prevention section of the law on a single book written in 1997.

Oh, did I mention that HB 392 as written would make abortion illegal in Delaware?

Yep, great deal you've got there.
delacrat said…
Steve,

1. Libertarians did not create the current health care system. We don't get elected, recall?

True enough. I'll have more to say about this in reference to your point 3)

2. It's all very well and good for you to set up your "libertarian ideologue" straw men, but let's not pretend that what you are attempting to do has any intellectual validity. I've repeatedly made the case that there are multiple things that can be done to give greater access to health care to everyone without creating massive government bureaucracies. You just like to posture."

What would you rather have. One "[G]overnment bureaucracy" concerned with the public's health or the many corporate "Health" insurance bureaucracies concerned with CEO golden parachutes, political "contributions", lobbyist fees, sales commissions, profit objectives and dividends.

3. Nobody has to pass kidney stones now without that four dollar prescription. Current law allows them to go to an emergency room, get diagnosed, and get that prescription. Find me a few cases of people suffering from kidney stones because they could not get a prescription for Percosett. Otherwise STFU.

If you can get a prescription for a non-emergency condition without a visit to an emergency room and it's attendant hour(s) long wait in the examination stall, possibly with an hysterical gun-shot victim and the other side of the curtain, why not the rest of us?

Moreover, if it's not kidney stones, but a kidney boulder, requiring surgery or lithotripsy, well, the ER will just "stabilize" you and send you on your way to come up with the cash for adequate treatment. If you can't, you're Sh*t-out-of-luck.

Anyone dependent on the ER for health care knows the ER is a poor substitute for a comprehensive healthcare system.

I recall in previous posts your "case that there are multiple things that can be done to give greater access to health care for everyone". Many, if not all, I thought had merit. I do not recall, however, them as part of Gary Johnson's platform, as they apparently not worth advocating since the current system, such as it is, still serves the haves-and- have-mores well. Which may explain, in part, why Libertarians,
as you correctly say, "don't get elected".

As for single-payer in Delaware, you don't have to be a libertarian to understand that (a) the funding mechanism doesn't work;


If a funding mechanism that works to send the Delaware National Guard to whatever the 4th county is, in perpetuity, we can find one to ensure adequate health care for all Delawareans.

(b) the population in the state is too low to support a stand-alone system; and (c) there are far too many services not even provided in Delaware (at any price) for single-payer to work.

Vermont is of similar size and that's not deterring them and for-profit health insurance has ensured availability for every service within Delaware ?

That's aside from the idiocy of "the Authority" and a vapid nonsense of basing the entire fraud prevention section of the law on a single book written in 1997.

Fraud does not happen with for-profit health insurance ?

Oh, did I mention that HB 392 as written would make abortion illegal in Delaware?

That can be fixed with an amendment to HB 392. No need to throw baby out with bath water.

Yep, great deal you've got there.

Great for me, you, Delaware and even Libertarians too.
Delacrat, in the spirit of dialogue I promise to return to this, but life its own self is interfering, and it almost certainly won't be till tomorrow.
Delaware Watch said…
It's just fraudulent to even suggest that a free market system would provide affordable universal health insurance and care. Insurance companies now freely admit that they don't want to cover high risk populations. And that has nothing to with the paperwork and everything to do with the cost, and every Libertarian knows it.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...