Skip to main content

Brilliant (brief) foreign policy send-up at Anti-war.com

You probably have not heard the term "anti-access," and don't know how it relates to the militarizing of American foreign policy.  This article will take about five minutes to read, and leave you with some high-quality questions:

A snippet: 

Take, for example, a piece in the most recent issue ofForeign Affairs, the main establishment journal, by Andrew Krepinevich, a West Point graduate with a PhD. from Harvard who has served on the personal staff of three Defense Secretaries and now heads the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments think-tank. Here is a key sentence:
"The challenges that China and Iran pose for U.S. security lie not in the threat of traditional cross-border invasions but in efforts to establish spheres of influence in, and ultimately to control access to, critically important regions."
Now, if that is how most Americans understand the supposed top two greatest threats the country faces, I’ll eat my foot. What the public sees constantly streaming on television, across headlines, and rushing out of politicians mouths is that Iran and China are outlaw states that are threats to the security of Americans. And that’s whypolling generally shows Americans are troubled by these two threats.

Comments

delacrat said…
"What the public sees constantly streaming on television, across headlines, and rushing out of politicians mouths is that Iran and China are outlaw states that are threats to the security of Americans."

It's instructive to remember how our Free World Free Press, not so long ago, acquitted itself in the lead-up to the Iraq war.

"...viewers were more than six times as likely to see a pro-war source as one who was anti-war; with U.S. guests alone, the ratio increases to 25 to 1." And we know how that turned out.

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1145

OK Steve, here's my "high-quality question": Since the corporate media are not to be trusted with arguably the most important of issues. What from the Libertarian perspective is to be done about it? Term limits for news corporations? Public ownership of the airways? Should the "journalists" who ginned up the Iraq war be held to the same standards as Julius Streicher before they have us go quietly into the night of Iran and China ?
Here's the high-quality answer (although I can only guarantee that it is from my perspective):

We have a long tradition in America of journalists ginning up wars that goes back to Mexico in the 1840s, Spain in the 1890s, Guatemala in 1950s, ad infinitum ad nauseum.

"Public" ownership of the airways, excuse me, already exists. Boy, that's helped solve the problem, hasn't it?

How about we just acknowledge that this is entertainment and propaganda and treat it all like "reality TV"?

Meanwhile, don't buy the products they advertise.

Find out the information for yourself (it's almost all out there).

The problem is not primarily the newscasters or their corporate masters or even their government licensors and sources.

It's us. We have the media we deserve.
delacrat said…
"'Public' ownership of the airways, excuse me, already exists."

Ha .......Ha......Ha......

"In just a few days, the F.C.C. is going to give away the first broadcast licenses for digital television to broadcasters for absolutely nothing." -Senator Robert Dole, 03/27/1997 New York Times

http://www.nytimes.com/1997/03/27/opinion/giving-away-the-airwaves.html

"Boy, that's helped solve the problem, hasn't it?"

Well, I suppose, prior to 1997, you may have had a point.
You either missed my point about public airwaves (or, more likely, I did not make it very well).

I was being sarcastic. Because we essentially have a corporatist government, "public" ownership of the airwaves IS corporate ownership.

Even prior to 1967 so-called public ownership was both a drag on innovation and a restriction to non-corporate ownership.

Even if you believe (which I don't, but let's make the argument) that this is a situation that requires government control/supervision/whatever, what happens if the government itself has been totally co-opted by corporations? You can't use the government to bring corporate greed to heel if the corporations are running the government.

That's what I meant, but I was rushing through the comment because I had somewhere else to be. Sorry.
delacrat said…

Steve,

I overlooked your quotes marks around 'public'. We'll just have to agree that we agree :0 !

delacrat

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?