Skip to main content

And before anybody tees off on Kathleen Sebelius over her taxes...

... let me suggest you get a life.

I don't agree with Governor Sebelius' policy views, and I don't like the agenda she's been picked to pursue.

But that's neither here nor there regarding the question of her tax problems.

At first, like everybody else, I groaned when I saw the headlines and the figure of around $7,800 in back taxes and interest.

Then I read that this amount comes from the combined total of three different years, and breaks down as follows:

-- Charitable contributions over $250 are supposed to include an acknowledgment letter from the charity in order for a deduction to be taken. Out of 49 charitable contributions made, three letters couldn't be found.

-- Sebelius and her husband took deductions for mortgage interest that they weren't entitled to. The couple sold their home in 2006 for less than what they owed on the mortgage. They continued to make payments on the mortgage, including interest. But since they no longer owned the home they weren't entitled to take deductions for the interest. The same thing happened with a home improvement loan. Sebelius said they "mistakenly believed" the payments were still deductible.

-- Insufficient documentation was found for some business expense deductions.


She found 46 of 49 acknowledgement letters from charitable contributions dating back to 2005? Which doesn't mean that she didn't make the contributions (notice, she didn't lack the canceled checks or proof that she made the donations), it just means she couldn't properly document it to the letter of the law.

Likewise, some business expense deductions were found not to be fraudulent or illegal or evasive, but just to lack sufficient documentation. Big whoop.

Finally, that mortgage interest thing: I was in a somewhat similar situation twelve years ago, and got four different opinions on what that statute actually said (three from accountants; one from the IRS--which told me I could take the deduction, by the way).

Anybody--anybody--making above $250K who had to turn in three years of tax returns to get scrubbed would frankly be thrilled to come out of the process owing less than $8K.

It has nothing to do with your morality and pretty much everything to do with a tax code that makes criminals of us all.

So here's my final answer on Kathleen Sebelius: grill her over policy and positions all you want.

But if you're trying to gin up an issue over her taxes, you're part of the problem.

Comments

kavips said…
Nice Job, on bringing this to our attention..

I agree.
I agree.

If anything, the people in the administration with tax issues can serve as poster children for simplification of the tax code.

If they can't understand it, who can?

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?