Skip to main content

Gun violence and American society

Steven D at Booman Tribune [via jason at Delawareliberal] asks an important question about the recent Binghamton massacre and our society.

Here's the gist:

It doesn't matter to me why a "crazed" or "evil" (take your pick) individual walked into an immigration services center in Binghamton, New York and shot and killed 14 people seemingly at random. Just like it doesn't matter to me why the kids at Columbine wanted to kill their whole school, or the Virginia Tech shooter wanted to to shoot as many of his fellow students and faculty members as he could before dying, or why the man in Alabama who killed 11 people thought it was a good idea to go on a revenge rampage. Or why anyone decides to take a gun and shoot a spouse, girlfriend or themselves. Discerning the motivations or reasons why people kill each other with firearms is, in the end, a fruitless endeavor. For this is the society we've chosen.

We've chosen to live in a society where firearms, both the legal and illegal varieties, are ubiquitous. We've chosen to allow a single issue special interest group to promote laws (and heavily fund the campaigns of politicians who support their agenda) that make it easier than ever for anyone to buy, carry and use firearms of all kinds, from small caliber concealable pistols to large caliber machine guns....

We've chosen to live in a society where murderous gangs of foreign and domestic drug dealers can obtain almost any weapon made in America by using straw purchasers to go to unregulated gun shows to buy these weapons and the ammunition needed to equip their private armies....

We've chosen to live in a society which has turned a blind eye to the fact that our nation leads the developed world in homicides, suicides and other deaths caused by firearms, as well as non-fatal gun injuries, by a large margin. Even nations racked by poverty and criminal gangs such as Brazil and Mexico have a lower per capita rate of deaths caused by firearms than our nation....

This is the society we've chosen. Don't ask why this wave of mass killings by firearms continues in our country. Don't ask why people can acquire a gun and kill you, your family or themselves with it easier than they can obtain a driver's license. It doesn't really matter why. There will always be people in any society whose hatred or anger or sociopathic personality traits or just the evil which lurks in everyone's soul will lead them to commit violence against others and themselves. So don't ask why they do it.

What you should be asking is why we have chosen to live in a society which makes it so easy for these people to acquire deadly firearms with which to commit violence, mayhem and murder? Because, that is the only question that really matters.


There are several problems with this post, which I'll deal with in a footnote below, but it is a legitimate question:

What kind of society have we chosen for ourselves?

We've chosen a society in which the largest exporter of guns, tanks, combat aircraft, and all other forms of weapons used in virtually every major conflict across the planet is not the manufacturers of the firearms that private citizens can purchase, but defense contractors whose products are subsidized, approved, and even underwritten by the United States government....

We've chosen a society in which--even after the failed experiment with alcohol prohibition--we have allowed personal conduct with respect to drugs to become criminalized and which therefore drives an underground international black market whose profits rival those of the largest multi-national corporations and therefore give rise to massive violence and failed states....

We've chosen a society in which our media--from television to music and film--glorifies indiscriminate violence, and whose purveyors (the artists, producers, and distributors) use massive amounts of money for political campaign contributions to lobby for various causes while cashing on on scenes of simulated slaughter....

We've chosen a society in which police violence in the so-called war on drugs and government surveillance in violation of the US Constitution as a by-product of the so-called war on terror have both reached such endemic proportions that they contribute to making millions of people fearful that their own elected government and its all-powerful bureaucracy are--at the same time--incapable of protecting them while it violates their rights.

We've chosen a society in which it is more important to discuss the sexual histories, marriages, and adoptions of entertainment figures than it is to engage in civil debate of critical national and international policy issues to the point where meaningless slogans substitute for public discourse....

We've chosen a society in which people get to select single issues out of a myriad of complex, inter-related factors for self-righteous rants that appeal chiefly to those who already share their views....

------------

The footnote:

The devil is always in the details, which in this case is within the links. Steven D, for example, says,

Even nations racked by poverty and criminal gangs such as Brazil and Mexico have a lower per capita rate of deaths caused by firearms than our nation.


But click through the link and you'll find he's citing a study not of Mexico's current drug-war killing fields, but of Mexico (and selected other countries) vs the US from 1900-1995. I love data that's fifteen years old, don't you?

Or how about the un-sourced 2004 presentation on the supposed life-span costs of gun violence in the US, which makes a ludicrous mono-causal statistic argument that the only factor necessary to explain differences between our life-span and that of other industrialized nations is gun violence. Not obesity, not heart disease, not differences in recording infant mortality, not our health care system, but simply gun violence....

It always pay to click through at least some of the links...

Comments

D.M. McGowan said…
It may be that the US has the largest number of firearms related deaths ... the accumulation and publication of international statistics is misleading. However, the number of homicides and suicides is far exceeded in several countries. The number of homicides and suicides as a percentage of population is exceeded in the vast majority of nations.
Dave
www.dmmcgowan.blogspot.com

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...