Skip to main content

University of Delaware report: Delawareans say "No!" to increased taxes

A lot of our friends suggest that the question of greater taxation has been settled, that patriotic, adult Americans understand that that they have to be willing to pay significantly more taxes to improve education, infrastructure, health care, and that only rightwing extremists, racist tea baggers, and fanatic libertarians are still concerned about our tax burden.

Apparently not so. Kilroy provided the link that sent me to this March 2008 study by the University of Delaware regarding what kind of tax burden First State citizens would be willing to accept in order to improve public education.

The results are ... surprisingly libertarian for a State that is portrayed as a leading light in the Obama-nation.

Here are the results:

83% of Delaware citizens reject the idea of a sales tax to support education.

76% of Delaware citizens reject the idea of increasing income taxes to support education.

66% of Delaware citizens reject the idea of increasing property taxes to support education.

Consumption taxes fared better:

57% of Delaware citizens approve of the idea of luxury taxes to support education.

51% of Delaware citizens approve of the idea of "vice" taxes to support education.

Broken down by income levels, it is intriguing to find that lower-income Delaware citizens are more likely to reject property tax increases than those making over $75K/year.

The study also discovered that, as a general rule, Delaware citizens are less likely than the national average (by about 5 points) to accept the idea of increasing taxes to support public education.

The truly important thing about this polling data is that traditionally education has been one of the items for which people were most likely to be willing to pay additional taxes. So if folks are leary of having their taxes raised for this, then it suggests that the issue of fairness in taxation is not dead in Delaware after all.

Some notes:

The study did not allow for the high percentage of New Castle County families with children in private schools, nor did it distinguish by age--which is arguably just as important as income level. (It is, after all, usually the retiree community that votes en masse against most increases in schools taxes.)

But it provides substantive data to suggest that those who want to declare taxes a dead issue in the Brave New World aren't in quite as strong a position as they think they are.

Comments

kavips said…
Framing:

It is all about framing... Were the question asked like this: would you settle for shitty schools to save 20 dollars off your property taxes?

I'm sure the percentages would not be as anti tax as yours...
Hube said…
Isn't a sales tax a "consumption tax?"
Tyler Nixon said…
Funny we get shitty schools anyway, without saving anything on ever-increasing property taxes.
kavips
Framing is for use when you are trying to convince; it is pretty useless for serious polling because it prejudices the answer.

But to be clear: these aren't my stats, they are the ones that UD compiled.
G Rex said…
So basically Delawareans just don't support education? Makes sense, given that we elected and then re-elected Governor Minner.
Adam Kissel said…
Delaware Libertarians should watch this video about violations of individual rights at the University of Delaware:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EbQfmVoOfM

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?