Skip to main content

University of Delaware report: Delawareans say "No!" to increased taxes

A lot of our friends suggest that the question of greater taxation has been settled, that patriotic, adult Americans understand that that they have to be willing to pay significantly more taxes to improve education, infrastructure, health care, and that only rightwing extremists, racist tea baggers, and fanatic libertarians are still concerned about our tax burden.

Apparently not so. Kilroy provided the link that sent me to this March 2008 study by the University of Delaware regarding what kind of tax burden First State citizens would be willing to accept in order to improve public education.

The results are ... surprisingly libertarian for a State that is portrayed as a leading light in the Obama-nation.

Here are the results:

83% of Delaware citizens reject the idea of a sales tax to support education.

76% of Delaware citizens reject the idea of increasing income taxes to support education.

66% of Delaware citizens reject the idea of increasing property taxes to support education.

Consumption taxes fared better:

57% of Delaware citizens approve of the idea of luxury taxes to support education.

51% of Delaware citizens approve of the idea of "vice" taxes to support education.

Broken down by income levels, it is intriguing to find that lower-income Delaware citizens are more likely to reject property tax increases than those making over $75K/year.

The study also discovered that, as a general rule, Delaware citizens are less likely than the national average (by about 5 points) to accept the idea of increasing taxes to support public education.

The truly important thing about this polling data is that traditionally education has been one of the items for which people were most likely to be willing to pay additional taxes. So if folks are leary of having their taxes raised for this, then it suggests that the issue of fairness in taxation is not dead in Delaware after all.

Some notes:

The study did not allow for the high percentage of New Castle County families with children in private schools, nor did it distinguish by age--which is arguably just as important as income level. (It is, after all, usually the retiree community that votes en masse against most increases in schools taxes.)

But it provides substantive data to suggest that those who want to declare taxes a dead issue in the Brave New World aren't in quite as strong a position as they think they are.

Comments

kavips said…
Framing:

It is all about framing... Were the question asked like this: would you settle for shitty schools to save 20 dollars off your property taxes?

I'm sure the percentages would not be as anti tax as yours...
Hube said…
Isn't a sales tax a "consumption tax?"
Tyler Nixon said…
Funny we get shitty schools anyway, without saving anything on ever-increasing property taxes.
kavips
Framing is for use when you are trying to convince; it is pretty useless for serious polling because it prejudices the answer.

But to be clear: these aren't my stats, they are the ones that UD compiled.
G Rex said…
So basically Delawareans just don't support education? Makes sense, given that we elected and then re-elected Governor Minner.
Adam Kissel said…
Delaware Libertarians should watch this video about violations of individual rights at the University of Delaware:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EbQfmVoOfM

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...