Skip to main content

For the folks who insist on seeing major differences between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. . .

. . . and who insist that those of us who think they are pretty much the same are only pursuing a "third party strategy" of equivalence. . .

. . . this editorial cartoon in today's News Journal suggests that our meme might be catching on:

Comments

Dana Garrett said…
I believe that your claim that there are not big differences between Obama and Romney is both true and misleading. While their is substantial *close* agreement between them, the slight differences between them can make a big, possibly even critical, difference in people's lives. For example, voucherizing Medicare would cause irreparable harm to many people.
October 25, 2012 at 7:53 PM
Steven H. Newton said…
Dana,

I am not blind to differences in some policy areas.

But every person, regardless of party or ideology, has their own list of prioritized reasons to support or oppose, discriminate between or lump together candidates.

Just as I don't think Barack Obama ever seriously thought he could achieve single-payer health care or even negotiated drug prices, but held those out from time to time in his career to win votes, I don't think that Mitt Romney seriously believes he can ever voucherize Medicare--it's red meat for the base. It is rhetoric rather than reality.

That's point one.

Point two is this: MY personal list for president considers foreign policy, military intervention, and US-sponsored human rights violations around the world to be one of my highest priorities. With respect to those I see little or NO difference between Obama and Romney.

If you rate saving Medicare as a higher value for selecting a president, you are not going to see it that way, obviously. And that's OK.

But please remember that it was Barack Obama who cut Medicare by $750 billion (I admit the GOPers would have liked more) and it was John Carney I listened to at UD last week say (I paraphrase but very closely) "to pay for the ACA we're going to have to pay providers less."

Continually paying doctors less is not the way to get high quality health care.
October 25, 2012 at 8:38 PM
anonone said…
Steve,

If you consider women's health issues as human rights and civil liberties issues (as I think they are), then there is a tremendous difference between Obama and Romney. Also, teh gays.

Still, I am voting Green this year.

a1
October 25, 2012 at 8:55 PM
Steven H. Newton said…
So despite the fact that you rejected both candidates (as I did), somehow my point is invalid?

Man, you really have a case of the ass, don't you?

By the way, on abortion rights and marriage equality I'm fine with Gary Johnson. His support of marriage equality as a constitutional right is about, what, five times better than Obama's opportunistic but hollow posturing?

Ironically, however, we do have this in agreement: despite my complete lack of use for her domestic policies, Jill Stein would be my second choice, because at least she'd follow a de-militarized foreign policy, restore civil liberties, and cut defense spending.
October 25, 2012 at 10:32 PM
Dana Garrett said…
I certainly agree that the differences between Obama and Romney on foreign and military policy are so marginal as to be invisible. But I do think that domestic issues, particularly pocket book issues for the middle class and poor, are paramount. About that the albet slight but real differences between Obama and Romney are significant for millions of people.
October 26, 2012 at 9:14 AM
Steven H. Newton said…
And that, Dana, is where we part company--albeit amicably.

I can't bring myself to choose one warmonger over another based on better domestic policies. Seems to be like getting bribed to ignored Pakistani children being shredded by our drones.

And since, inside Delaware, my vote won't matter anyway (Obama will win in a walk), a vote to open up the political system is hardly going affect Medicare or whatever this time around.

But it might provide some more alternatives in four years.

Wonder how many more brown people will be dead by then who'd have been alive if Gary Johnson were actually elected President?
October 26, 2012 at 9:18 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici...
1 comment
Read more

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?
1 comment
Read more

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...
70 comments
Read more