Skip to main content

Smear Tactics and School Board Campaigns

The Delaware Civil War over education continues, and the evidence suggests we have reached the point where any civility (or common sense) has left the building.

The case for the prosecution, a garbage hate site called:

Vote No on Val Harris 4 Christina School Board

Now, for truth in advertising purposes, I think I have met Ms. Harris once, with a large group of other people in an event at Delaware State University, hosted by our President, Dr. Harry Williams.  I have no idea about what she believes, who is funding her campaign, or exactly what she's done to so aggravate one WEEGEESQEEGEE to engage in this type of tactics.

What I do know is that this blog engages in character assassination, pure, simple, and vomitously vile.




Let's take a look, reading from bottom to top.


Valene Harris today appeared on Wilmington TV channel 28 to get a one sided endorsement from an education reformist who knows little about schools. She appeared concerned about PZ schools but offered no solutions.

No solutions = no vote.

OK WeeGee, let's count the ways:

1--Most endorsements are one-sided, or they are not endorsements.

2--Who was the "ed reformist" and how does WeeGee know they knew little about schools?  Don't know, but hey I generally trust my voting decisions to somebody who picks an internet handles named after a wet cleaning implement.

3--Ms. Harris was concerned about PZ schools.  You'd think this was a good thing.

4--But she didn't have any solutions.  If she did, we'd also like to see her part the Red Sea.  Everybody in Delaware understands that Partnership Zone Schools are in serious trouble, and pretty much nobody knows what to do about them.  That's, uh, why they are problems

Then there's there's a criticism of Ms. Harris's answers for the WNJ candidate poll as being too sketchy.

However, before one throws stones, one ought to examine the evidence.  Consult the View From Lower Delaware, where Milford School Board member Wolfe Gary makes a very important point about these questions:

First I was more then disappointed with your attempt at posting information about the upcoming school board elections in the Sunday News Journal on 22-Apr-2012. Your article did not even mention half of the questions that we were asked in the survey, and you posted some of that information out of context. 
In other words, we don't actually know what Ms. Harris said in her answers, because the paper didn't print all of them.

Next good old WeeGee accuses Ms. Harris of funding the notorious push poll that has been working its way around the state.  Notice those last words "working its way around the state."  No candidate in any district authorized it.  But WeeGee asserts that Ms. Harris is tied to it (without evidence--one does not need evidence when RIGHT is on their side, you know), and then accuses her of breaking election law by not filing a report of all the contributions that WeeGee knows must be there.

Newsflash, WeeGee:  if a school board candidate raises less than $2,000, they don't have to file a report.  It's called "the law."

Next, because Ms. Harris is honest about which "side" she supports in the ed reform war, WeeGee has her "spewing rhetoric" and "gulping down"--what did she do that was so horrible?  She supported Common Core Standards.  Yep, there's room for people to disagree over the Federal imposition of Common Core Standards, but just because Ms. Harris believes in them and says so doesn't make her an enemy of children, does it?  Oh, it does.  Never mind.

Love the next one, the accusation that Ms. Harris is a "Leadership Delaware Plant."  Usually, WeeGee, the term "plant" is reserved for somebody who is hiding something, not somebody who posts their status as a Leadership Delaware fellow on their campaign web page.  Great going, Sherlock.  You alleged a conspiracy over something the candidate is proud enough of to brag about.

As a matter of fact, WeeGee old fellow/girl, your current Christina School Board President Eric Anderson is also a former Leadership Delaware Fellow.

And while Leadership Delaware does have a politically conservative bent in its senior leadership, the reason you will find education reformers (Lillian Lowery, Paul Herdman and "Skip" Scheonfels) and and eclectic array of others on the speakers' list, including folks like Senator Chris Coons, Joseph Masiello (Teacher of the Year), Deborah Stevens of the DSEA, Councilman Jea Street, DSU President Dr. Harry Williams, and Tom "Tommywonk" Noyes.  All of these people, by agreeing to speak before this group have also thereby indicated their belief that this is a mainstream leadership development group--legitimate if tending conservative.

In other words, good ole WeeGee is attempting to sell you a conspiracy where none exists.

The next part is equally on the up-and-up, WeeGee--"Will Valene Harris bring church into schools?"

The source:  again, that super-secret document, Ms. Harris' campaign webpage, where she admits--OMG OMG OMG stop the presses--that she attends church, considers herself a Christian, has worked in church-related youth groups, and probably plans to bring back the Inquisition or have the Gideons pass out Bibles to your 2nd Graders.  (Those last two are in there to see if you are still reading.)

So Ms. Harris' abetting sin is that . . . she goes to church and participates in community service.

Damn her and all those like her.

What you got, WeeG?  Oh, yeah--your own little investigation discovered that she pays her taxes on time, but you think her sewer bill is too low.

Plainly a candidate with no tax arrears demands an investigation and should not be trusted.

Then the WeeG goes back to unfounded innuendo about Leadership Delaware trying to buy the election.  The amazing thing about this rhetoric is that it actually passes for public discourse in the current Delaware Education Civil War.

We end, bringing you up to date, with the WeeG demanding to see tax receipts and tax filings that no other candidate will be asked to show, and why?  Because she shows tax arrears?  No, every "investigation" (and I use the term loosely, as in loose screws) shows no liens, no defaults, and no delinquencies.  But the Wedgie cannot find more than two years of records on the County website, and  . . . wait for it . . . there must be a conspiracy.

So, according to the Wedgie, here's what's wrong with Valene Harris

She pays her taxes on time and in full.

She has a position on some educational issues that the Wedge doesn't agree with.

She's a Leadership Delaware fellow (shhh, don't tell anybody).

She goes to church.

She received an endorsement from somebody the Wedgie doesn't like.

She appeared on TV.

She's probably a female impersonator from Canada who does two shows a night at Rehobeth Beach every summer.  No, wait, that's Christopher Petersen.  You really should see his show.

But I digress.

Why do I digress?

Because I'd like to be able to say that dear old WeeGeeSqueeGee is some sort of anomaly in the Delaware Education Civil War.

But, unfortunately, he/she/or probably it isn't.


Disclaimer:  I have nothing to do with the Christina School Board race, and absolutely no idea whether Valene Harris would make a good board member or not.  And I am also working with the campaign of Joanne Johansen for the Red Clay School Board, which has absolutely nothing to do with this post.

What this post has to do with is character assassination and mudslinging of the vilest kind, that has suddenly become an acceptable tactic in Delaware.

Comments

Awful site, just awful.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...